Worst to handle with new candidates but employee benefits are good in terms of projects and everything - SAP ABAP Developer Capgemini Employee Review

4.0
Jan 14, 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

1. Good projects 2. Friendly environment, friendly management. 3. Easy work culture 4. No precentreon employees 5. Best company for women, they are treated on top of the world

Cons

1. New employees are treated badly, no communication with HR and management 2. Global Command centre or IMOC is worst scam going here, employees are screwed on the name of development 3. Internal Job Portal is a fake service my CG, nobody has benefited from it yet, still they are proudly promoting it 4. Towers hierarchy are worst here.

avatar
Capgemini Response
6y
Hi! Thank you for taking the time out to write this review. We are glad that you got a chance to work on good projects and enjoyed the work culture. Your feedback helps us improvise our policies to make them more employee-friendly. Hence, we've made a note of your feedback and will make sure to relay it to the concerned team. Thank you and have a great day.

Explore other reviews about Capgemini

5.0
Jul 5, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Company provides training on soft skills and technical skills prior to placing on a project.

Cons

Client contracts can end unexpectedly so you may not get to work on a project long term and change from project to project.

1.0
Jun 30, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

there are no pros for this company

Cons

I was laid off after spending several months on the bench, with "lack of available projects" cited as the reason. However, another consultant in the same role who was also without an active client engagement was retained. As a woman and racial minority, I could not ignore the disparity in how these decisions appeared to be made. Before my termination, I reported being recorded without my consent and raised concerns about conduct that I believed reflected implicit bias. I was referred to as "URM" instead of by my name or role, encouraged toward race based employee resource groups rather than meaningful career opportunities, and repeatedly advocated for fair project placement while on the bench. My employment ended shortly after I raised these concerns. Following my termination, I pursued the matter through the appropriate internal and legal channels. I provided documentation supporting my concerns and gave the company multiple opportunities to investigate and resolve the issues. Rather than meaningfully addressing the evidence or acknowledging the seriousness of the allegations, the company denied wrongdoing, offered what I viewed as a nominal severance, and declined to accept accountability. Employees deserve confidence that concerns about discrimination and retaliation will be investigated objectively and fairly. My experience left me with the opposite impression.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All