**Title: Disappointing Candidate Experience Despite Multiple Rounds** I recently went through the interview process with SAP and wanted to share my experience in a constructive way. The interview process itself was quite extensive, involving around five rounds: an HR discussion, technical interviews, a coding challenge, and a manager round. Overall, the interactions during the interviews were professional, and I felt the discussions went well. However, the post-interview experience was disappointing. I was informed that I would receive feedback within two weeks, but there was no communication even after three to four weeks. During this time, I sent multiple polite follow-up emails, mainly requesting feedback so I could improve for future opportunities. Unfortunately, I did not receive any response. After more than a month, I finally received a generic rejection email without any specific feedback. I understand that hiring processes can be complex and time-consuming, especially in large organizations. However, timely communication and basic feedback—especially after multiple rounds—would greatly improve the candidate experience. Candidates invest a significant amount of time and effort preparing for and attending these interviews, and a lack of response can be quite frustrating. I hope this feedback helps improve the communication process for future candidates. **Pros:** * Structured interview process * Professional interviewers **Cons:** * Lack of timely communication * No feedback provided after multiple rounds * Delayed response beyond communicated timeline

The whole process is just okay. Unfortunately, they choose the cheapest guy after 4 rounds interview. I received the call from a developer and take it on the next day. Then I was required to take interviews onsite. I took 3round for the whole afternoon. Each round have 2 tech workers with varied questions and coding. The last round is the manager and only focused on ur expected salaries. I asked a bit higher that i searched it after interviews.