CbD Program is not what you think... - Junior Consultant IBM Employee Review

3.0
Mar 24, 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

IBM is very flexible. Working from home is great.

Cons

The CbD program flaunts itself as some kind of recent graduate mutually beneficial training program to groom you to be a consultant, but don't let that fool you. I remember when I first started, I came here to glassdoor to check the reviews and I found one where the reviewer was talking about being laid off. He said "Dont be fooled, you can be laid off just like everyone else!" I talked to one of my peers about it and they said that does not happen to CbD'ers as long as your trying really hard to get staffed, which I was trying my absolute hardest. The problem is IBM hired way to many resources. There were hundreds of recent grads like me trying to find projects. Sure enough, a year later it happened to me too. They tell you that they will find you projects to work on and that you only need to put in a little effort to find them, but the truth is you are competing with everyone around you for projects, and they (Management) dont do much of anything to help you. If you go to long without a project, they will fire you. Yes, I said fire you, because they make it seem like your getting "laid off" but from a HR standpoint, you are being fired, which means your next employer will know about it. They not only not "launched my career", but they actually significantly damaged my reputation in the working world. Many IBM Managers still have this manage by fear mentality also and a very serious fraternal style attitude where the newer consultants are treated like were worthless.

Explore other reviews about IBM

5.0
Jun 10, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Relocation bonus and welcoming team

Cons

Very large and corporate at times

4.0
Aug 26, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Disclaimer: A lot of what I'm writing below of course depends on the work area and management chain. But I found this to be fairly pervasive policies in IBM in my 9+ years with the company. 1. IBM's policies and management are very flexible when it comes to working remotely or accommodating various life situations (sick days, doctor visits, etc.). Management is encouraged to measure an employee by their work and impact, and not by hours spent at their office. 2. Great colleagues! Though unfortunately, many have been leaving due to the instability of IBM's HW development business. 3. At least in my area, there's a high level of flexibility on which projects should I undertake based on my and my management assessment of business impact.

Cons

1. Unfortunately, IBM still uses the "normal distribution" rating system, where at the end of the year each employee is ranked as a top contributor (5%), above average contributor (15%), average contributor (~75%), and bottom contributor (5%). This curve is difficult to apply in the R&D world, where you may have many members of the team working long and hard hours, and end up being "average contributors" at the end of the year, because there just isn't room for all to be top contributors. 2. The above may not be so disturbing, if only IBM didn't practically cancelled all raises, performance bonuses and incentive for the non top-performers. I've had a consistent "above average" rating in the last 4-5 years, and my raise and performance bonus were ridiculous mere 1.5-2% of my salary. Were I rated "average contributor" I would have gotten NOTHING. So you can imagine that people can go year after year without any raise to their salary. From talking to manager friend, this is IBM's way to eliminate the non-top-performers without having to fire them, as part of its direction of reducing US manpower. 3. Hiring freeze in many areas - again, as part of IBM's attempt to reduce its workforce across North America and Europe we see many jobs move to the India and Far East markets. This is of course upsetting to see local teams shrink and disappear, especially when many great local IBM colleagues and experts begin to drop out. From my experience thus far working with India SW teams - they are still very far away from the standards I would have expected from US and Europe based teams. 4. Poor top down communication about company's and divisions' future. Employees learn from rumors and news websites what's about to come...

636
avatar
IBM Response
10y
Thanks for sharing your experience, and we're glad that you've had a positive experience working with talented colleagues and taking advantage of IBM's programs. IBM is in the midst of a major transformation, --our Systems business is going through its own changes to strengthen competitiveness. Change is never easy. As part of our transformation, we just launched a whole new approach for how we are coaching employees, delivering feedback and managing reviews. No distribution guidelines or what some think of as 'stacked rankings." What's particularly great is that this was co-designed with our employee base from all over the world... to the tune of hundreds of thousands of page views, comments, on-line debates and discussions. IBMers even named the new system Checkpoint, to reflect the regular feedback rituals we're adopting. Managers are more empowered with the new methodology to help them acknowledge the great work of their teams and help their employees develop professionally. These steps and more are showing up in our employee surveys as well. So IBMers are feeling the change. We are confident these changes will help us in continuing to attract and retain great talent.
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All