IBM: Okay if you are a superstar, but have an exit plan just in case. - Senior Software Engineer IBM Employee Review

1.0
Feb 25, 2009
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

If you want to live in the Hudson valley and work as a computer engineer, IBM is basically your only option. If you are very talented as an engineer and a salesman of your ideas and you have a bit of luck, you will get to work on very interesting technical problems.

Cons

IBM in the US is shrinking, and as an employee you will compete with your coworkers for survival. Many people have been at IBM for 30+ years. They have survived many layoffs. If you want to keep your job, you need to be better then they are in the eyes of your manager. Being talented and hard working is not enough. You need to sell your ideas to managers. Most managers were talented engineers at one point, but managers are shuffled often, so most manage groups whose work they have a limited understanding of. If you can't explain to your non-technical relative why you are valuable to IBM, you will struggle to keep your job, no matter how valuable you really are. There is a constant flow of people who join IBM right out of college and are gone within four years. About half find better jobs because they have IBM on their resume. The other half change fields entirely, or go back to school. A manager being laid off is unheard of. Non-managers generally distrust what managers say about layoffs, because managers are invulnerable and so have no empathy. The managers I had took every opportunity to say that yearly ratings were based on your performance and not compared to your pears. In other words, everyone under a manager could get a high rating. This was to fight a persistent rumor that managers can not give high rating to everyone. I believe the rumors are mostly true: A manager could give everyone a great rating, but other managers would question that manager's judgment, so in practice no manager does it. One trap to watch out for is moving to a town like Poughkeepsie NY, where IBM is a large chunk of the local economy, when IBM is at a hiring peak. The housing market moves with IBM's hiring or layoffs. If you buy a house when IBM is hiring, and are forced to sell it a few years later when IBM fires many people, the loss you will take on the house could easily be greater then a year's salary. Ouch. IBM tends to use technologies that are internal or not the industry standard. Often the IBM way was invented before the industry standard way, and often the IBM way is (or was) better by a small margin. Keep in mind that IBM may not be the last place you work before you retire, and make sure that you learn some skills that will allow you to get a job elsewhere. If you spend ten years at IBM and become an expert in the IBM method of making chips, you may find that you can not pass an interview to get a job making chips somewhere else.

Explore other reviews about IBM

5.0
Apr 20, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

You can find good mentorship since many people stay for a long time.

Cons

Onboarding process and goals from HR are inconsistent.

4.0
Aug 26, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Disclaimer: A lot of what I'm writing below of course depends on the work area and management chain. But I found this to be fairly pervasive policies in IBM in my 9+ years with the company. 1. IBM's policies and management are very flexible when it comes to working remotely or accommodating various life situations (sick days, doctor visits, etc.). Management is encouraged to measure an employee by their work and impact, and not by hours spent at their office. 2. Great colleagues! Though unfortunately, many have been leaving due to the instability of IBM's HW development business. 3. At least in my area, there's a high level of flexibility on which projects should I undertake based on my and my management assessment of business impact.

Cons

1. Unfortunately, IBM still uses the "normal distribution" rating system, where at the end of the year each employee is ranked as a top contributor (5%), above average contributor (15%), average contributor (~75%), and bottom contributor (5%). This curve is difficult to apply in the R&D world, where you may have many members of the team working long and hard hours, and end up being "average contributors" at the end of the year, because there just isn't room for all to be top contributors. 2. The above may not be so disturbing, if only IBM didn't practically cancelled all raises, performance bonuses and incentive for the non top-performers. I've had a consistent "above average" rating in the last 4-5 years, and my raise and performance bonus were ridiculous mere 1.5-2% of my salary. Were I rated "average contributor" I would have gotten NOTHING. So you can imagine that people can go year after year without any raise to their salary. From talking to manager friend, this is IBM's way to eliminate the non-top-performers without having to fire them, as part of its direction of reducing US manpower. 3. Hiring freeze in many areas - again, as part of IBM's attempt to reduce its workforce across North America and Europe we see many jobs move to the India and Far East markets. This is of course upsetting to see local teams shrink and disappear, especially when many great local IBM colleagues and experts begin to drop out. From my experience thus far working with India SW teams - they are still very far away from the standards I would have expected from US and Europe based teams. 4. Poor top down communication about company's and divisions' future. Employees learn from rumors and news websites what's about to come...

636
avatar
IBM Response
10y
Thanks for sharing your experience, and we're glad that you've had a positive experience working with talented colleagues and taking advantage of IBM's programs. IBM is in the midst of a major transformation, --our Systems business is going through its own changes to strengthen competitiveness. Change is never easy. As part of our transformation, we just launched a whole new approach for how we are coaching employees, delivering feedback and managing reviews. No distribution guidelines or what some think of as 'stacked rankings." What's particularly great is that this was co-designed with our employee base from all over the world... to the tune of hundreds of thousands of page views, comments, on-line debates and discussions. IBMers even named the new system Checkpoint, to reflect the regular feedback rituals we're adopting. Managers are more empowered with the new methodology to help them acknowledge the great work of their teams and help their employees develop professionally. These steps and more are showing up in our employee surveys as well. So IBMers are feeling the change. We are confident these changes will help us in continuing to attract and retain great talent.
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All