Typical large tech company - Senior Hardware Engineer IBM Employee Review

3.0
Jan 5, 2009
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

It has been a fairly stable place to work for the last 6 years. The work can be interesting at times. There is some variety, and lateral movement within a division is generally easy. It can be a good place to learn, with a lot of resources (scopes, analyzers, chambers, etc) available, which small companies can't afford. You may come in contact with experts in many fields, research scientists, etc. There are education benefits that might possibly be better than comparable companies.

Cons

I can only comment on xSeries, a subdivision of STG. Depending on the management chain, work/life issues can either be treated well, or badly. Like any large company, creative employees can feel stymied by the bureaucracy. xSeries is/was a large area, with a variety of projects to work on. Many of the hardware projects/jobs are moving to Taiwan, and software to mainland China. The career path of an engineer seems non-existent. There is nothing to work towards, newhires and senior engineers work on the same stuff. Being a capable senior engineer does not guarantee a lead position, or preferential treatment when it comes to layoffs. Dead wood can survive a very long time. It's easier to dispose of a bad employee by sending off with a decent review, so the next dept gets the problem. Employee benefits have been steadily eroded for the past 10-15 years, the culmination being the freezing of the pension plan in '08. The guys with more than 30 yrs as of last year have a nice retirement to look forward to, the rest not so much, and newhires get the worst deal of all.

Explore other reviews about IBM

5.0
Jun 28, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

1. Company work culture 2. benefits 3. learning resources

Cons

As IBM is a big firm, the process time might take bit longer

4.0
Aug 26, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Disclaimer: A lot of what I'm writing below of course depends on the work area and management chain. But I found this to be fairly pervasive policies in IBM in my 9+ years with the company. 1. IBM's policies and management are very flexible when it comes to working remotely or accommodating various life situations (sick days, doctor visits, etc.). Management is encouraged to measure an employee by their work and impact, and not by hours spent at their office. 2. Great colleagues! Though unfortunately, many have been leaving due to the instability of IBM's HW development business. 3. At least in my area, there's a high level of flexibility on which projects should I undertake based on my and my management assessment of business impact.

Cons

1. Unfortunately, IBM still uses the "normal distribution" rating system, where at the end of the year each employee is ranked as a top contributor (5%), above average contributor (15%), average contributor (~75%), and bottom contributor (5%). This curve is difficult to apply in the R&D world, where you may have many members of the team working long and hard hours, and end up being "average contributors" at the end of the year, because there just isn't room for all to be top contributors. 2. The above may not be so disturbing, if only IBM didn't practically cancelled all raises, performance bonuses and incentive for the non top-performers. I've had a consistent "above average" rating in the last 4-5 years, and my raise and performance bonus were ridiculous mere 1.5-2% of my salary. Were I rated "average contributor" I would have gotten NOTHING. So you can imagine that people can go year after year without any raise to their salary. From talking to manager friend, this is IBM's way to eliminate the non-top-performers without having to fire them, as part of its direction of reducing US manpower. 3. Hiring freeze in many areas - again, as part of IBM's attempt to reduce its workforce across North America and Europe we see many jobs move to the India and Far East markets. This is of course upsetting to see local teams shrink and disappear, especially when many great local IBM colleagues and experts begin to drop out. From my experience thus far working with India SW teams - they are still very far away from the standards I would have expected from US and Europe based teams. 4. Poor top down communication about company's and divisions' future. Employees learn from rumors and news websites what's about to come...

636
avatar
IBM Response
10y
Thanks for sharing your experience, and we're glad that you've had a positive experience working with talented colleagues and taking advantage of IBM's programs. IBM is in the midst of a major transformation, --our Systems business is going through its own changes to strengthen competitiveness. Change is never easy. As part of our transformation, we just launched a whole new approach for how we are coaching employees, delivering feedback and managing reviews. No distribution guidelines or what some think of as 'stacked rankings." What's particularly great is that this was co-designed with our employee base from all over the world... to the tune of hundreds of thousands of page views, comments, on-line debates and discussions. IBMers even named the new system Checkpoint, to reflect the regular feedback rituals we're adopting. Managers are more empowered with the new methodology to help them acknowledge the great work of their teams and help their employees develop professionally. These steps and more are showing up in our employee surveys as well. So IBMers are feeling the change. We are confident these changes will help us in continuing to attract and retain great talent.
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All