Pros
-Professional amenities -Ample opportunities for extra curricular activities -Encourages upskilling -Scope of internal movements -Inclusive towards LGBTQ, Differently abled
Cons
-Very poor work life balance. Too much work. Sometimes they don't hire people to balance workload. Instead, expect existing people to work extra. -The top performer always gets extra work and the ones who chill continue to chill. You are given enough rewards/recognition if you are a top performer and convinced about this stating that we want you in this project. No better person to do., etc -No work boundaries -> disturbed after working hours or when on breaks -Professional bias in some teams based on language spoken. -Contrastingly encourages well being and extra curriculars - but does not help in lowering workloads. Not sure how employees can take part in such initiatives. If one is interested to take part, then the workload gets tripled for the next day. - Once you put down papers or set boundaries with health concerns after being a top performer - micromanagement begins. -Promotions are sometimes postponed in comparison with experience of peers. Unless you complete certain years, even if you are a top performer, you need to wait for your turn. -Everything is a priority - Few managers do not set boundaries with leadership even if juniors encourage to push back. Managers simply say - leadership said "what to do. Even I am ending up doing it. " -Working on weekends is so normalized. -You are expected to slog to finish work. But when year end reviews come up you are also pushed back stating you have not done professional certifications. Not sure how some managers expect employees to work for 12-15 hours for the entire week and sit and stare at computer screens again to upskill. -Not supportive with internal transfers to other countries unless your team operates there and the pay is lesser than the country you work from.