Onboarding - Senior Analyst Capgemini Employee Review

4.0
Jun 29, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good work-life balance: Many employees report reasonable working hours and flexibility, especially in support and consulting projects. Strong learning opportunities: The Airoli campus is often recommended for freshers because of structured onboarding, training, and opportunities to upskill. Supportive work culture: Employees frequently mention helpful colleagues, collaborative teams, and an inclusive environment. Large, modern campus: The campus has multiple office buildings, cafeterias, shuttle services within the campus, and good infrastructure. Career stability: As one of Capgemini's major delivery centers, it offers exposure to enterprise clients and long-term projects.

Cons

Project allocation can be unpredictable: Several employees mention getting assigned to projects that don't match their technical skills or career goals. Compensation: Salary increments are a common concern, particularly for freshers and early-career employees. Internal processes: Onboarding, access provisioning, approvals, and documentation can sometimes be slow. Management varies by project: Experiences differ significantly depending on the manager and client account. Some teams receive excellent feedback, while others report micromanagement. Commute and traffic: The Airoli Knowledge Park area gets congested during peak hours, and nearby footpaths and roads can become crowded around office timings. Housing quality: If you're relocating, finding a good PG or rental nearby may require careful research, as some newcomers have reported poor-quality accommodations

Explore other reviews about Capgemini

5.0
Jun 25, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good inclusive culture , supportive community

Cons

You have to be proactive and show above and beyond quality

1.0
Jun 30, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

there are no pros for this company

Cons

I was laid off after spending several months on the bench, with "lack of available projects" cited as the reason. However, another consultant in the same role who was also without an active client engagement was retained. As a woman and racial minority, I could not ignore the disparity in how these decisions appeared to be made. Before my termination, I reported being recorded without my consent and raised concerns about conduct that I believed reflected implicit bias. I was referred to as "URM" instead of by my name or role, encouraged toward race based employee resource groups rather than meaningful career opportunities, and repeatedly advocated for fair project placement while on the bench. My employment ended shortly after I raised these concerns. Following my termination, I pursued the matter through the appropriate internal and legal channels. I provided documentation supporting my concerns and gave the company multiple opportunities to investigate and resolve the issues. Rather than meaningfully addressing the evidence or acknowledging the seriousness of the allegations, the company denied wrongdoing, offered what I viewed as a nominal severance, and declined to accept accountability. Employees deserve confidence that concerns about discrimination and retaliation will be investigated objectively and fairly. My experience left me with the opposite impression.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All