Shutterstock Reviews

3.2

49% would recommend to a friend

(678 total reviews)
avatar

Paul Hennessy

39% approve of CEO

22% positive business outlook

Shutterstock has an employee rating of 3.2 out of 5 stars, based on 678 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Shutterstock employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

678 reviews
1.0
Jun 5, 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

There are not pros at shutterstock: read below.

Cons

Do not walk away, RUN away from this toxic company. The board doesn’t care what happens to the company, why should they when the ceo owns most of it? Does the CEO care? Nope, he’s already a billionaire and is CHECKED OUT. Okay.. does the management team care? Maybe, but they are INCOMPETENT. All of them are from slow growth old-school companies like Revlon cosmetics?? Seriously? Not exactly ex-google or apple pedigree. One person in particular is named Steven Berns: the cfo/coo, he has created a 27 step process for promoting a single person, no staplers are purchased, no offer letters signed, no one eats, breathes or THINKS without his ok. Hear that?? >>>No one thinks without his ok<<< Steven Berns giveth and Steven Berns taketh away. Blessed be the name, Steven Berns. Zero empowerment. American company? More like a Soviet company. People under the age of 40 must* feel empowered to do their jobs. Shutterstock can’t empower their people because they DO NOT trust their people. Shutterstock only wants mindless pawns. Which is exactly what they have. I have never in my career met a greater gathering such disenfranchised and simultaneously maliciously opportunistic people. Everyone who has bothered to stay at shutterstock exists to just take as much money from them as possible and run. No one cares; this place is toxic to millennials. Anyone in their 20s or 30s who really cares about their work has left long ago. For comic effect, try searching linkedin for 'past not currently at shutterstock' - that will tell you all that you need to know. FUTURE CANDIDATES AND CURRENT EMPLOYEES: ask yourself! Do you want to work at a company with 10th rate management? Do you want to spend your valuable time helping a checked out founder? Do the other damning reviews below concern you? (2.7stars out of 5? 38% approve of CEO???) There are plenty of great companies to work for in the world, Shutterstock is dead. It will always be dead. No amount of praying at its grave will change that. So if someone asks you to work there... tell them that Steven Berns toxic reputation precedes them and that you’d rather rot in hell than take a job there.. because trust me we’d rather rot in hell than stay here too.

1.0
Jan 3, 2019

Post acquisition nightmare

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I struggle to think of any...

Cons

Very top heavy with ineffective leaders. Everything is personal and political, no one is motivated to do a good job for the sake of it. People stall each other at every turn if it will benefit whatever cause or empire they are trying to build. Over 15 years of professional experience and Custom had some of the poorest management I have ever seen. Bad behavior, harassment, and dubious deals are constantly rewarded if it adds to the bottom line.

1.0
Jul 28, 2018

Don't!

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Because there's high turnover, you can get promoted quickly if you work in New York. Good for your CV.

Cons

1. Upper management doesn't care about it's people or its business. It ONLY cares about its short-term stock price movements. This is why we have to endure hiring freezes and a massive lack of resources every quarter despite having zero debt and $250M in cash. 2. Org structure: The company changes its org structure every couple of years. Just before I started they had a GM structure in place, then moved away from it when I started, then switched back to it last year and now they are considering moving away from it again. The worst part, you can work in an office where no one in the office shares the same boss within the same department! They all report into management in NYC. As a result, you don't feel like you're part of one big team. 2. Turnover at C-level: If you don't believe me, feel free to look it up. I've worked for the company for 2 years. Everyone in the C-suite except the CEO and the COO have been replaced at least once, if not twice during that time. Each time, a new C-level person comes in, including the CTOs we've had, they change everything which puts the company in constant state of migration (especially when it comes to tech). More on this below. 3. Turnover for general employees: For the reasons mentioned above, turnover in the organization is very high. This leads to huge problems, especially for developers because there is no one around who can explain how things are built. In 2017, they replaced all but 1 tech VP. 4. Migrations: The company is in a constant state of tech migrations instead of actually creating something of value for its customers. They sign big SaaS deals with third party providers and then realize they don't want or need the service anymore. This is partially due to the high turnover. Essentially, the people who sign the deals don't stick around long enough to see the services being adopted within the company. When new people come in, they suggest we change services and the cycle starts all over again. All 400 developers are working on migrations as we speak. Example: Front end platform: The company took 2 years to build a new platform for all of Shutterstock.com. It was completed in 2016. In January of 2017, a new CTO joins the company. He doesn't like the new platform, so he decides to scrap it and built another one. Well, 1.5 years later about 50 developers are still building it. Example 2 Backend services: For roughly 5 years the company has been trying to migrate out of an old tech stack that literally no one knows how it's built. This migration continues and has blocked us from being able to innovate. More examples: The company has switched large scale CMSs at least 3 times in the last 2 years. Each one takes about 6 months to integrate. In addition, the company has been migrating toward using Salesforce for roughly 4 years now with no end in sight (literally). Also, most of the companies web properties are in the process of being moved to AWS. I can continue but I think you get the picture. Bottom line: Trust the reviews on the Glassdoor. They are poor for a reason.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 678 Reviews

Glassdoor has 814 Shutterstock reviews submitted anonymously by Shutterstock employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Shutterstock is right for you.