Very controlling environment - Software Engineer GEICO Employee Review

1.0
Jul 11, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Job stability - They will train you if you don't have the right experience - A lot of women in middle management

Cons

- The culture is strict and controlling. There's a dress code that you have to pay to get out of. You have to work exactly 8.5 hours a day (no working through lunch so you can leave 45 minutes early) and they audit your entry and exit to enforce it. They have the desks set up so that your coworkers can watch you and report on you to management, and they will tell you all of this to scare you into compliance. - On my project, the code reviewers/architects had absolute power. They nitpicked at our code, but gave us limited guidance on how to do things correctly. Senior developers complained that they were only given rote work and were told that that was just the way it was. - They advertise themselves as essentially being a tech company and as a recipient of an award for women in IT, but it does not feel like a tech company at all and I would estimate that less than 10% of the developers that I encountered were women. None of the architects or code reviewers were women. - The headquarters building is gross. I have seen a mouse and a large cockroach. It seems like the work areas never get cleaned. There was dust and coffee stains everywhere.

Explore other reviews about GEICO

5.0
May 29, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good work life balance and pay

Cons

Long hours sometimes depending on demand

2.0
Jun 12, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Organized in the hiring and training process

Cons

They cared more about output and getting results than the understanding of all the knowledge they cram into us. In addition, we were in training/orientation with mostly supervisor candidates. Meaning, first, there were so many people that did things in vastly different ways which created confusion on expectations and overall objectives of the job. Secondly, it meant that those candidates were finding their footing and being evaluated just as harshly (if not more) than new hires, creating pressure that boiled over to almost every individual on a team.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All