Stable Company ; Good career path if you land in a good project - Consultant Capgemini Employee Review

3.0
Jan 4, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

1. Not that rigid policies and procedures 2. Good L & D practices 3. Stable company

Cons

1. Low pay hikes 2. Cost-cutting measures by the company will make you sometimes frustrated 3. Some arrogant and unapproachable people at higher management level; not ready to understand your problems. 4. You can't deny any project assigned to you; If you do that, they will loop in high level HR managers and try harassing you. 5. Some inefficient project managers make your growth stagnant. 6. Local sentiments play a big role; people belonging to same region of the country grow collectively, and people from other states lag behind; sounds strange; but true!! 7. FOR FRESHERS::: May train you in JAVA / .NET ; but there is 100 % chance that they will put you in some testing project , thus ruining your career from the beginning only !! 8. Classroom training is very inefficient sometimes; with less experienced internal trainers; BUT , they also hire sometimes good outside trainers too. 9. Performance appraisal is always a concern for employees; which has never been transparent; and if a manager has a grudge upon you; be sure that he will ruin your entire career!!

Explore other reviews about Capgemini

5.0
Jul 4, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great place to work - depending on the market unit

Cons

Depends on which market unit you work fir

1.0
Jun 30, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

there are no pros for this company

Cons

I was laid off after spending several months on the bench, with "lack of available projects" cited as the reason. However, another consultant in the same role who was also without an active client engagement was retained. As a woman and racial minority, I could not ignore the disparity in how these decisions appeared to be made. Before my termination, I reported being recorded without my consent and raised concerns about conduct that I believed reflected implicit bias. I was referred to as "URM" instead of by my name or role, encouraged toward race based employee resource groups rather than meaningful career opportunities, and repeatedly advocated for fair project placement while on the bench. My employment ended shortly after I raised these concerns. Following my termination, I pursued the matter through the appropriate internal and legal channels. I provided documentation supporting my concerns and gave the company multiple opportunities to investigate and resolve the issues. Rather than meaningfully addressing the evidence or acknowledging the seriousness of the allegations, the company denied wrongdoing, offered what I viewed as a nominal severance, and declined to accept accountability. Employees deserve confidence that concerns about discrimination and retaliation will be investigated objectively and fairly. My experience left me with the opposite impression.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All