Onboarding - Senior Software Engineer Capgemini Employee Review

4.0
Mar 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The onboarding process was smooth and easy to understand. The welcome experience was warm and well-organized. Lunch was provided, which was a thoughtful gesture. The HR team was supportive, approachable, and very helpful.

Cons

There are no cons — everything was good.

avatar
Capgemini Response
3mo
Thank you for sharing your 5-star feedback. Capgemini is pleased to know that you found the onboarding process smooth, easy to understand, and well‑organized. Providing a warm and thoughtful welcome experience is an important priority, and it is encouraging to learn that the arrangements, including the provided lunch, contributed positively to your first day. The supportive and approachable efforts of the HR team are also appreciated, and it is good to know that this added value to your overall experience. Your comment mentioning that there are no cons and that everything was good is sincerely appreciated. Feedback of this nature reinforces the effectiveness of our current practices and motivates us to continue delivering a consistently positive experience for all colleagues. Thank you once again for the contributions you make at Capgemini. Wishing you continued growth and success in your future endeavors.

Explore other reviews about Capgemini

5.0
Jul 5, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Company provides training on soft skills and technical skills prior to placing on a project.

Cons

Client contracts can end unexpectedly so you may not get to work on a project long term and change from project to project.

1.0
Jun 30, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

there are no pros for this company

Cons

I was laid off after spending several months on the bench, with "lack of available projects" cited as the reason. However, another consultant in the same role who was also without an active client engagement was retained. As a woman and racial minority, I could not ignore the disparity in how these decisions appeared to be made. Before my termination, I reported being recorded without my consent and raised concerns about conduct that I believed reflected implicit bias. I was referred to as "URM" instead of by my name or role, encouraged toward race based employee resource groups rather than meaningful career opportunities, and repeatedly advocated for fair project placement while on the bench. My employment ended shortly after I raised these concerns. Following my termination, I pursued the matter through the appropriate internal and legal channels. I provided documentation supporting my concerns and gave the company multiple opportunities to investigate and resolve the issues. Rather than meaningfully addressing the evidence or acknowledging the seriousness of the allegations, the company denied wrongdoing, offered what I viewed as a nominal severance, and declined to accept accountability. Employees deserve confidence that concerns about discrimination and retaliation will be investigated objectively and fairly. My experience left me with the opposite impression.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All