Think Twice Before You Join - Consultant CGI Employee Review

1.0
Oct 23, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Large company, some projects may allow you to work from home, decent benefits

Cons

management treats employees like children, no matter how old you are; usually very rude and disrespectful. unrealistic deadlines lack of professionalism and collaboration. Many people don't know what they are doing. No training! you are 100% on your own. Management asks you (either team lead or team member) to reach out to other projects for directions or materials because it is your job! A lot of team leads don't know what they are doing. Toxic environment, too much drama, and troublemakers. long hours and working on weekends, 75% to 100% traveling and constant relocation. Be prepared for lots of bad/negative office politics. Office politics on every level.. including Jr. level. Be prepared to be micromanaged. Morale is very low. Promotion with no pay raise. Promotion takes a very long time. Once you are in, it's difficult to get out, because specialized applications designed for state and local governments, outdated technology.

Explore other reviews about CGI

5.0
May 27, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good work environment Strong leadership

Cons

Room for growth can be limited unless you really seek it out.

1.0
Jun 16, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

no specific positives to highlight from my perspective

Cons

I worked at CGI in both India and the USA and observed similar workplace culture concerns across both locations. The only real difference was HR—India HR felt more supportive, while my experience with USA HR was disappointing. My employment ended shortly after maternity leave due to an alleged “lack of projects,” which I experienced as a layoff. I also observed what appeared to be misuse of position by some leaders, including blurred professional boundaries, preferential treatment, and expectations that went beyond normal workplace roles—at times resembling personal-assistant-style demands rather than professional conduct. Surprisingly, I also noticed inconsistent “policies” applied differently to different individuals. In some cases, it felt like the rules changed depending on who you were. When leadership became aware that someone was related to another employee in the organization, it sometimes felt like that person was singled out or targeted rather than treated objectively. Overall, these practices—whether through inconsistent treatment, perceived power misuse, or favoritism—undermine trust, damage workplace culture, and raise serious concerns about fairness and professionalism.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All