Headed down wrong path - Anonymous employee CGI Employee Review

2.0
Jan 18, 2019
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Big company, opportunities if you initiate or find them, many excellent coworkers.

Cons

Cost reduction - even when not required or resulting in actual saving- dictate every decision from the top down. Planned layoffs continue despite overwhelming evidence that there is more work than workers, health benefits continue to increase in cost and deteriorate in coverage, investment in internal assets (pc, mobile) is non existentant and salary increases or annual bonus are shrunken to hit an overall low % rather than truly performance driven. And despite the wildly popular (just peruse the reviews here) benefit of allowing remote or flexible work from home, there is a mandate rolling out for everyone to begin working from an office location full time regardless of previous hiring agreement, role, team alignment, or available local office site.

Explore other reviews about CGI

5.0
Dec 5, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Growth, salary, learning material, freedom to plan your day

Cons

Could use better training guides for new employees

1.0
Jun 16, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

no specific positives to highlight from my perspective

Cons

I worked at CGI in both India and the USA and observed similar workplace culture concerns across both locations. The only real difference was HR—India HR felt more supportive, while my experience with USA HR was disappointing. My employment ended shortly after maternity leave due to an alleged “lack of projects,” which I experienced as a layoff. I also observed what appeared to be misuse of position by some leaders, including blurred professional boundaries, preferential treatment, and expectations that went beyond normal workplace roles—at times resembling personal-assistant-style demands rather than professional conduct. Surprisingly, I also noticed inconsistent “policies” applied differently to different individuals. In some cases, it felt like the rules changed depending on who you were. When leadership became aware that someone was related to another employee in the organization, it sometimes felt like that person was singled out or targeted rather than treated objectively. Overall, these practices—whether through inconsistent treatment, perceived power misuse, or favoritism—undermine trust, damage workplace culture, and raise serious concerns about fairness and professionalism.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All