Love the work; management is totally lacking in proper employee compensation. - Anonymous employee CGI Employee Review

2.0
Jan 3, 2013
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Excellent job opportunities and experience can be gained here. - Flexible work schedules and work from home programs well supported. - Career progression (ie. training) has been well supported with training budgets.

Cons

- No raises (salary frozen for multiple years now) - No annual salary increase to compensate for cost of living increases - Lack of promotions even when approved and well deserved (multi-year delays in processing) - Profit sharing non-existent due to poor performance of other groups - entire company suffers due to BU structures because of a single group not meeting profit targets, while others who have exceeded profit targets get nothing. - Overtime no longer paid out but necessary for some contracts; time off in lieu is offered but contract demands due to lack of resources means no time to take it. - Constant changes at the management level - constant restructuring begets ever changing management reporting and lacks focus.

Explore other reviews about CGI

5.0
Jun 18, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Work life balance, growth, quality

Cons

Less pay compared to market

1.0
Jun 16, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

no specific positives to highlight from my perspective

Cons

I worked at CGI in both India and the USA and observed similar workplace culture concerns across both locations. The only real difference was HR—India HR felt more supportive, while my experience with USA HR was disappointing. My employment ended shortly after maternity leave due to an alleged “lack of projects,” which I experienced as a layoff. I also observed what appeared to be misuse of position by some leaders, including blurred professional boundaries, preferential treatment, and expectations that went beyond normal workplace roles—at times resembling personal-assistant-style demands rather than professional conduct. Surprisingly, I also noticed inconsistent “policies” applied differently to different individuals. In some cases, it felt like the rules changed depending on who you were. When leadership became aware that someone was related to another employee in the organization, it sometimes felt like that person was singled out or targeted rather than treated objectively. Overall, these practices—whether through inconsistent treatment, perceived power misuse, or favoritism—undermine trust, damage workplace culture, and raise serious concerns about fairness and professionalism.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All