Not what I expected - District Manager ADP Employee Review

2.0
Apr 7, 2011
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Strong name recognition very stable financially secure

Cons

extreme mircro managing, high nepotism when dividing territories, pay too low for the amount of work required, rediculous expectations, if you are not on the "buddy list" it's extremely difficult to make quota, constantly changing territories on sales people, management does not know how to manage tenured sales group. Management all from payroll, so management style is transactional when sales cycle is strategic. The job I accepted was not what was explained to me. If I knew what the job actually was I would have never accepted the offer. Divisions do not talk to each other. There is not incentive for divisions to work together. People steal deals right out from under you. A TS rep can do a $500K deal and end up with only $175K in sales credit because of splits. TS is the hardest thing I have ever had to sell. 95% of the companies in your territory will not get approved by underwriting so you are constantly looking for the last 5% to reach out. Management expects 4 appts per week. Finding those 4 appts that are "fits" is like looking for a needle in a haystack. If you don't have 4 appts, you are called on the carpet. My question is do you want good appts or 4 appts to keep mgt off your back.

Explore other reviews about ADP

5.0
Jun 19, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Uncapped commission and great freedom

Cons

It’s a grind but worth it

2.0
Jun 15, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Established company with a long history and relatively stable business operations. - Provides a sense of job stability compared to many organizations navigating rapid changes in the current AI-driven market. - Lower risk of frequent restructuring or large-scale layoffs than many high-growth technology companies. - Opportunity to work with experienced employees who have deep institutional and domain knowledge. - Predictable work environment that may appeal to individuals seeking long-term stability over rapid change. - Strong choice for professionals who value job security and a steady career path in an uncertain economic climate.

Cons

- Documentation is limited or rusted, and many operational processes lack clear runbooks or standardized procedures, making onboarding and troubleshooting more difficult than necessary. - If you're coming from a modern, fast-paced engineering environment, the organization may feel behind current industry practices and tooling. - Internal politics can sometimes outweigh technical merit or execution. - There are teams with very long-tenured employees where change and innovation can be difficult to drive. - Decision-making often involves multiple layers of approval, resulting in significant bureaucracy and slower execution. - Processes can move slowly, and collaboration is not always transparent across teams, leading to inefficiencies and occasional confusion around ownership. - In some areas, roles, responsibilities, and operational processes are not clearly defined, creating unnecessary chaos and inconsistent ways of working. - Engineering standards and best practices vary considerably between teams, making cross-team collaboration challenging. - Organizational change tends to happen slowly, which can be frustrating for employees who are focused on modernization, automation, and continuous improvement.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All