In my 30 year career, I have never been dismissed so summarily as I was in this interview. To start, they have you submit your resume and cover letter, but there is also another online jotform specific to them where they ask if there is anything "unusual" on their job listing. Ok. They're looking for someone that is detail oriented. Assuming you get through that, they send you a link for a 45-minute Test Gorilla assessment. For the most part, it's a personality test. That alone should have made me run. There is a section testing your Quickbooks knowledge, but it's absolutely absurd since no one works the way you're tested here.
If you're lucky enough to get past that, you get to meet with the Managing Prinicipal. She's a treat. She's dismissive. She interrupts when you're responding. At the beginning of the interview she indicates that it's a meeting to see if we like each other, then you'd move on to the Accounting Director. Not quite. She's quizzing you on your accounting knowledge. I started my career using ledger books, balancing everything by hand. No software making my entries. To be questioned this way and put on the spot was insulting.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
When reviewing a new client's books for cleanup, would you look at the balance sheet, income statement or cash flow first?
I interviewed at The DXA Group (San Francisco, CA)
Interview
Right out the gate, DXA’s hiring process was a masterclass in disrespecting candidates’ time and expertise—especially for a senior fractional CFO role. The first stage required written interview-style answers, which to do well takes time. Then came an insultingly timed testing phase advertised as 30 minutes but actually lasting 50+ minutes, including an advanced IFRS accounting section that was less strategic and more “gotcha” minutiae about debit and credit details that controllers, not CFOs, typically handle. In today’s world, such transactional minutiae are managed by software—making this test feel archaic and irrelevant to the role.
Adding insult to injury, DXA includes DISC personality testing, a tool widely frowned upon and not recommended for employment screening due to fairness and validity concerns.
The worst part there was ZERO human communication throughout. Not a single acknowledgment, update, or response to questions—just silence. Follow-up messages vanished into the void.
Reading between the lines of other reviews, it’s painfully clear DXA’s polished exterior is just posturing. This process is a dehumanizing, tone-deaf, and frankly insulting ordeal that drains candidates’ energy without respecting their professional worth.
If you’re a senior finance leader looking for a respectful, transparent, and meaningful hiring experience, steer very clear of DXA.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
here was an early sign DXA was full of themselves: "Please note and list anything that seems strange, off, or out of place in the application. We’re on a bit of a fishing expedition to see what you catch :)
If it looks like a potential fit after review, we’ll send a short TestGorilla assessment as the next step. Be on the lookout for that once you’ve let us know the form is complete."