Glassdoor users rated their interview experience at Avantia Law as 100% positive with a difficulty rating score of 3 out of 5 (where 5 is the highest level of difficulty). Candidates interviewing for Consultant and rated their interviews as the hardest, whereas interviews for Consultant and roles were rated as the easiest.
Initial interview and then an NDA review test (they will share a playbook in advance and you will need to markup the NDA based on the playbook instructions within 2 hours time). Nothing dramatic, not hard.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
Legal practice experience; handling tight deadlines.
I applied online. I interviewed at Avantia Law in Feb 2026
Interview
Call with recruitment guyand a zoom interview with team manager
Quite an unprofessional company I feel, didn't think it was structured and seemed disorganised. I didn't get a positive impression from anyone I spoke with and people felt quite stressed out and on edge. Answers to my questions were vague. I think I might have been ghosted as well?
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
What do you know about Avantia
What about legal technology AI excits you
I applied through other source. I interviewed at Avantia Law in Jan 2026
Interview
I had an extremely poor interview experience with Avantia Law following what was described as a five-stage recruitment process.
After completing the fourth stage interview, I received no update for over a week and had to contact HR myself to ask for feedback or next steps. During that call, the HR representative stated that my application “would have fallen through the cracks if you hadn’t called,” which already demonstrated a concerning lack of organisation and respect for candidates’ time.
What made the situation worse was how the call was handled. While I was speaking, the HR representative abruptly ended the call mid-conversation. When I immediately called back, there was no answer and no follow-up. This felt extremely rude and dismissive, particularly given the length of the interview process and the expectation placed on candidates to remain engaged and professional throughout.
Earlier in the process, the fourth-stage interview itself was also disappointing. A senior member of staff appeared disengaged for most of the call, spending the majority of the time on her laptop and not actively participating in the discussion, which came across as dismissive and unprofessional.
Clear communication, basic courtesy, and respect for candidates’ time are fundamental expectations in any professional organisation. Unfortunately, this recruitment process showed poor HR coordination and raised serious concerns about the firm’s internal culture. Based on my experience, I would strongly advise candidates to proceed with caution.