Great company with work life balance but lack of charm of tech - Senior Software Engineer Zillow Employee Review

4.0
Mar 14, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

1. Great and friendly people. 2. Clearly defined project and well executed 3. Great executive leadership, clear roadmap on what they are doing. 4. Schedule is reasonable and not aggressive. 5. Easy problem to so solve if you like it.

Cons

The following cons are from engineering/eng-management prospective, may not related to other orgs: 1. Engineering talent/leadership is not top level, and if you are the top ranked engineer, you will feel a lot of push back and dragging. And great idea is not easy to spark out. 2. Mid-management is very laid back, need to be more aggressive to help the company moving to the right direction. 3. Granted, long staying people are now in mid-senior management level, but this is the problem of allowing the company to move forward. They have a lot of legacy, which *should* be fixed long ago if committing to it, but unfortunately, the safe route is always selected. 4. A lot of cost optimization can be done within the technical stack, but hard to convince people to care. 5. The technology management/development is traditional, you will see a bunch of Unix admin/DBA and ops, and handing day to day ops and also the blockers of moving fast in SOA world. I understand a lot of companies have similar problems, probably Zillow is better than all of its peers, but given Zillow is young and want to move to next stage, then it has to do something different.

avatar
Zillow Response
12y
To Former Senior Software Engineer in Seattle, Thank you for taking the time to provide the feedback regarding your experience at Zillow in the Seattle office. I am sorry your experience here wasn’t as positive as I would have hoped it would be. I must take issue with your comments around the Engineering talent at Zillow. Our engineers are some of the best in the industry and I would stack this team against any other. We maintain a high bar during the interview process where we look for strong technical ability as well as people who we believe will support and enhance our collaborative and open culture. Our engineers have built some impressive technology that has scaled with our data and traffic growth and allowed for a powerful user experience. When I look at how often we are shipping software (major releases every two weeks and some areas daily), the quality of the code, how well it is scaling and the creativity of the products our teams are building, I am incredibly proud of our results. We have also chosen to organize our engineering team into small product teams of around 4-12 engineers to provide clear areas of ownership and focus. I love how these teams drive their backlogs, working closely with the business team and senior leadership to review those plans, set goals and key metrics. These teams feel empowered and have a strong level of product ownership and understanding of how their products fit into the overall company strategy. Of course, there is always room for improvement, and I challenge our teams and individual engineers to look for better solutions, development processes and tools. Twice a year, during our HackWeeks, many engineers and small teams help move our architecture and development processes forward. We also created a dedicated team, called Velocity, which is working with all our product teams to ensure we are making investments in our core architecture and development tools to ensure ongoing developer independence and efficiency. Paying this development tax along the way is a great investment and helps us avoid large scale rewrites or product delays. Many companies don’t provide their engineering teams with the time to work on infrastructure based projects or clean up code, but we have strong support for this, including our CEO and senior business leadership. Different companies have different approaches to Operations. I prefer a model where the first tier of support for build out, deployment and monitoring/troubleshooting is being handled by a team with a clear operational focus and skillset. Our product teams need to be closely aligned with our Operations team, ensuring that the products are built with operability in mind. We have found that a strong operations team of DBAs, Systems Administrators, Network Engineers and System Operators can provide high value and allow the other engineers to focus more time on new product development. These teams work closely together and I think we are better off because of it. I do want to thanks you again for your feedback. It has taught me that we need to do a better job communicating internally and providing additional methods for individuals to share frustrations and provide solutions. - David Beitel CTO, Zillow P.S. To any other former, current or even potentially future employees, you can always reach me at davebei @ zillow.com to provide feedback or ask a question related to any of our product development technologies, processes or culture.

Explore other reviews about Zillow

5.0
Feb 8, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The posts about AWS culture infiltrating Zillow must be pretty team or person specific, as I've seen nothing but leaders who really care about their teams and the business. Middle managers can often drag down morale and culture - and working remote makes that hard to see/fix. But generally, the culture and support at Zillow is WAY better than any other tech company I've worked at (or heard about from friends). Fully remote with decent benefits and people who generally care about each other is fantastic (and hard to find in today's market). For those complaining about bad culture - I'd suggest you look at another role in another org, you might be pleasantly surprised the ZG people first culture is still strong.

Cons

Fully remote makes it hard to get the right visibility and promotions and ratings are unfortunately tied to whether senior leaders see your work and know who you are. You have to make an effort to be "seen" and that's hard to do remote. The news cycle is noisy with lawsuits, but I think a lot of that is because we're a big name with a big target on our back. A judge just ruled in Zillow's favor, against Compass.

2
avatar
Zillow Response
3mo
Thank you for taking the time to share your review. It’s great to hear that leadership support, flexibility, and a people-first culture have stood out in your experience. We also recognize that visibility and growth can feel different in a remote environment, and feedback like this helps highlight where continued focus and clarity matter. We appreciate you sharing your perspective.
3.0
May 8, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

You can make good money here.

Cons

In sales, job can change often. For example: I was making good money and excelling because I am a relationship Sales person. Then they changed it to where you get the sale, and instead of being able to grow that account via that relationship you just broke into, you have to pass it to an account manager and go back to cold/robo calling. You "book" of business you recive to prospect from is a lottery. I received a book of prospects/accounts that most of the were low income, or senior living properties. They don't have a budget and have a line of renter on a waitlist. No way to convince them to spend money on advertising but you still have the same quota.

2
avatar
Zillow Response
2w
Thank you for sharing such a detailed perspective. We understand that frequent changes to roles, account ownership and business priorities can have a real impact on relationship-building and the day-to-day experience in sales. We’re glad to hear compensation was a positive part of your time at Zillow, and we appreciate you being candid about where the model and structure felt frustrating. Feedback like yours helps us better understand how these changes are experienced across teams as the business evolves.
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All