Prepare to live at your plant as an hourly technician. - Production Team Leader Procter & Gamble Employee Review

3.0
Jun 9, 2012
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

They do pay well for an hourly technician. The medical has gotten a bit worse since I've been here but is still better than a lot of what is available today. The profit sharing is nice, if less than what the people who started prior to 2005 receive.

Cons

A couple things here. First off and most importantly, the rotating shifts are horrible. There is no reason for them. Other than to keep employees from more easily advancing their education or seeking other employment opportunities. They justify it as having interaction with management. If that is important make managers rotate as well. They are not nearly as important to the day to day running of a manufacturing facility than the technicians are. As a matter of fact, there are probably at least 50% too many managers at this site. This leads to an even larger bureaucracy that makes the unneeded layers of said managers constantly trying to justify their jobs. We all realize we are just tools for managers to get their next promotion. Also, they try to sound incredibly earnest and attempt to convey that they are concerned with our safety while at the same time refusing to even have a a discussion involving rotating shifts and excessive over time. Just because we don't possess engineering degrees doesn't mean we are stupid. Please do not insult our intelligence, it is beneath both sides. Work/life balance is non-existent. There is also to much of a blanket over reaction to everything that happens here regardless of it being safety, quality or anything else. Instead of addressing the issue with those directly involved we have to pull the entire site/department or whatever into the situation to "ensure it never happens again". Here is the problem, you're dealing with equipment designed by human beings and other human beings operating it. There is not a possibility of never having an issue. If NASA has shuttles blow up what is the likelihood of us not having no one ever screw up putting a soap in a bottle? Pretty much not possible and it is arrogant presumption to expect otherwise. The real reason behind all of this is that it takes bonus money out of managers pockets and makes it harder for them to get their next promotion. End of story. There is a reason managers rotate to different sites or roles every 3 years or so. It is so they can step on whoever for whatever they need and not have to face those people in the long term. Again, please do not insult our intelligence by assuming we're too stupid to figure this out.

Explore other reviews about Procter & Gamble

5.0
Jun 25, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great Culture Opportunity to move cross-functionally

Cons

Hard to get into leadership if you don’t start in management

5.0
Jun 23, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

training in in depth, training on job, basic star interview questions good company, stable benefits are somewhat cheap

Cons

training can be a lot, you have about 1-2hr presentations biweekly where you get tested on different aspects of the plant, like steam system, water system, utilities etc, training can last up to 6 months paid once a month, irregular times on call, may have to work weekends depending on machines work long shifts, sometimes up to 16 hours depending on how machines run, expected to be at work by 6am for safety meetings, 5am sometimes depending on the site you work at, expected to stay if machines run poorly can be demanding- most entry level managers are fresh out of college and expected to train and manage individuals who have worked at the company for decades not very easy to change departments, takes a couple of years no matching 401k, they have their own profit sharing thing, if you quit before 3-4 years at the company, you lose the money

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All