Stable employment, but much to be desired. - Software Engineer Northrop Grumman Employee Review

2.0
Mar 16, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Laid-back workplace Good job security (notwithstanding layoffs in California)

Cons

No opportunity for growth. Annual raises are less than inflation and promotions are unlikely, regardless of effort put in. Benefits are garbage. Low-deductible plan costs too much to make financial sense, and the medium deductible plan is like not having insurance at all for a significant part of the year. Even after going through the deductible, it's hard to get insurance to cover anything. Full Return to Office where your coworkers get you sick + No sick leave (must use PTO) + Insurance that won't pay for your doctor visits and medication when you're sick. Quite the combination. Lead on my current project is not a software engineer, and it shows. Most of the work I did last year was fixing his very avoidable mistakes. Vesting period for employer contributions to 401(k) is 3 years, with no partial vesting. So unless you get lucky with a position that will keep you happy for three years, you get nothing.

Explore other reviews about Northrop Grumman

5.0
May 29, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Flexible work arrangement, 9/80 schedule, job security

Cons

Low pay, full time on site required for career growth

1.0
Jun 11, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Not much pros but talented coworkers.

Cons

I joined expecting a long-term career and initially had a positive experience. Unfortunately, the culture changed significantly after leadership transitions. Micromanagement increased, decision-making became highly centralized, and employee morale steadily declined. Many experienced employees and managers left during my time there, making it difficult to maintain continuity and trust within the organization. The work itself was meaningful, and I had the opportunity to support important projects with talented colleagues. However, recognition, career growth, and employee retention did not appear to receive the same level of attention as process, reporting, and management oversight. My layoff was communicated as unrelated to performance, which was appreciated. However, after years of contribution and institutional knowledge, the overall experience left me feeling that employees were viewed as replaceable rather than valued long-term assets.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All