2-3% per year raises no matter your performance - Manufacturing Engineer III Northrop Grumman Employee Review

1.0
Mar 28, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

pros: no matter how incompetent, lazy, and worthless you are, you can't get fired unless you cheat on your timecard or sexually harass someone

Cons

cons: see pros (so you're stuck dragging a ton of lazy deadweight no matter your title, 70% of the folks in every job role are totally useless, with the other 30% working themselves to death because they actually care and are useful) as well as: some organizations aren't even eligible for the annual bonus, while others within the same program see 4k-10k/yr in bonus. Be careful - even if you ask before being hired if you'd be eligible for bonus, they will tell you you are. It's straight up a lie. At least in Palmdale, CA, on the F35 and on other programs, there is an established culture of lieing to make yourself or your group look better, "making the metrics tell a story" aka fudging the numbers or messing with the statistics so they show something favorable, if not accurate, and generally climbing over coworkers or other teams to try to make yourself look better, even if that means destroying others in the process. It's ... a good time.

Explore other reviews about Northrop Grumman

5.0
Nov 17, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Always a new learning opportunity - Many opportunities to work with new people based on different programs, so it always feels new - Roles are so niche that you can focus on the work rather than wearing too many hats

Cons

- Lower drive from coworkers to work hard due to relative job security from having to get a clearance, etc. - Promotions and raises felt disconnected from my performance - No travel for conferences or other opportunities to discuss with the community

1.0
Jun 11, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Not much pros but talented coworkers.

Cons

I joined expecting a long-term career and initially had a positive experience. Unfortunately, the culture changed significantly after leadership transitions. Micromanagement increased, decision-making became highly centralized, and employee morale steadily declined. Many experienced employees and managers left during my time there, making it difficult to maintain continuity and trust within the organization. The work itself was meaningful, and I had the opportunity to support important projects with talented colleagues. However, recognition, career growth, and employee retention did not appear to receive the same level of attention as process, reporting, and management oversight. My layoff was communicated as unrelated to performance, which was appreciated. However, after years of contribution and institutional knowledge, the overall experience left me feeling that employees were viewed as replaceable rather than valued long-term assets.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All