Fundamentally broken management - Senior Principal Systems Administrator Northrop Grumman Employee Review

2.0
Jan 24, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Work supports the defense of the nation - Flexible work schedules - Great peers

Cons

The management is fundamentally broken. No direction, or cohesive strategy to address security requirements. Nepotism and cronyism is rampant. Ancient internal processes, cheaply and inefficiently run, drains time and effectiveness from employees. Do more with less, you will be told, when your department experiences high turn over, and the extra work falls on understaffed and burnt out departments. They seem to be actively alienating senior staff so when they quit can be replaced with inexperienced low paid staff who will stay long enough to get experience, get burned out, and then abandon ship.

Explore other reviews about Northrop Grumman

5.0
May 29, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Flexible work arrangement, 9/80 schedule, job security

Cons

Low pay, full time on site required for career growth

1.0
Jun 11, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Not much pros but talented coworkers.

Cons

I joined expecting a long-term career and initially had a positive experience. Unfortunately, the culture changed significantly after leadership transitions. Micromanagement increased, decision-making became highly centralized, and employee morale steadily declined. Many experienced employees and managers left during my time there, making it difficult to maintain continuity and trust within the organization. The work itself was meaningful, and I had the opportunity to support important projects with talented colleagues. However, recognition, career growth, and employee retention did not appear to receive the same level of attention as process, reporting, and management oversight. My layoff was communicated as unrelated to performance, which was appreciated. However, after years of contribution and institutional knowledge, the overall experience left me feeling that employees were viewed as replaceable rather than valued long-term assets.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All