OK starter job for low to average talent, or good retirement plan for former military. - RF Design Engineer Northrop Grumman Employee Review

1.0
Dec 3, 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

9/80 schedule and you don’t have to do much. Interview is easy due to lack of talent inside of the company. If you have a clearance you can pretty much vacation and do nothing with your day. Not much is expected of employees. You get to work on obsolete stuff which can easily be looked up on the internet, if you choose to take that initiative. Hires and promotes based on affirmative action tax incentives (this can be good or bad depending on your situation).

Cons

Benefits are pretty stripped in the details and erode over time, low pay, and promotion granted on time with company (as opposed to results). Hire and fire defense contractor. What is most profitable for the company is contract extension, not a successful result/product/etc., meaning failure is more profitable than success. There is a real stigma in the commercial space against former employees from this industry due to their lack of ability to deliver and title inflation, which restricts opportunity down the road. Summary layoffs are often defense industry wide due to acts of congress, so be prepared to be unemployed for quite some time. Be aware of heavy nepotism and other favoritism as management often knows the government budget years in advance and will earmark positions for relatives and friends.

Explore other reviews about Northrop Grumman

5.0
May 29, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Flexible work arrangement, 9/80 schedule, job security

Cons

Low pay, full time on site required for career growth

1.0
Jun 11, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Not much pros but talented coworkers.

Cons

I joined expecting a long-term career and initially had a positive experience. Unfortunately, the culture changed significantly after leadership transitions. Micromanagement increased, decision-making became highly centralized, and employee morale steadily declined. Many experienced employees and managers left during my time there, making it difficult to maintain continuity and trust within the organization. The work itself was meaningful, and I had the opportunity to support important projects with talented colleagues. However, recognition, career growth, and employee retention did not appear to receive the same level of attention as process, reporting, and management oversight. My layoff was communicated as unrelated to performance, which was appreciated. However, after years of contribution and institutional knowledge, the overall experience left me feeling that employees were viewed as replaceable rather than valued long-term assets.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All