Young software engineers avoid this company - Software Engineer Northrop Grumman Employee Review

2.0
Apr 17, 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Stable job. Depending on projects, some can be relaxing, if you are in a unclassified project, you can work from home. Classified projects have more crazy hours. Benefits are decent. There are some attempts to modernize outside of classified projects.

Cons

Ineffective upper managers. I proposed a tool to use to my manager. I created a proof of concept that worked and reduced the manual process by 90%. Multiply this by X which could save the company millions of dollars. I had to pitch it to an even higher upper manager, lead director level. He shot it down. I quit that team due to major differences in approaches and joined a different project. Guess what, a C level manager got a whiff that the project was not modernized enough. Then a months later, they took what I had done before and placed their name on it and shipped it. I didn't get any "Thank You"s or "Good Job". Hiring managers don't care about your career. There was a time-span of a few months where I was jumping from project to project with no clear goal as to where I was ending up. When I said I wanted to work in Python, I worked in C++ instead. They don't care. This is not a company for young people to work in. Too many old people caked in there old practices. If you want to be impactful and learn, don't join, you will just be disappointed. If you want to learn best practices, there is nothing to learn here. No one so far I found was competent enough at there job. Its all bandages and no surgery. Technical debt is crazy high. Teams that say they do "agile" but are not, don't even include the word "iterative" in their definition of "agile".

Explore other reviews about Northrop Grumman

5.0
May 7, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Excellent pay, benefits and work/life balance

Cons

I have no negatives at this time

1.0
Jun 11, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Not much pros but talented coworkers.

Cons

I joined expecting a long-term career and initially had a positive experience. Unfortunately, the culture changed significantly after leadership transitions. Micromanagement increased, decision-making became highly centralized, and employee morale steadily declined. Many experienced employees and managers left during my time there, making it difficult to maintain continuity and trust within the organization. The work itself was meaningful, and I had the opportunity to support important projects with talented colleagues. However, recognition, career growth, and employee retention did not appear to receive the same level of attention as process, reporting, and management oversight. My layoff was communicated as unrelated to performance, which was appreciated. However, after years of contribution and institutional knowledge, the overall experience left me feeling that employees were viewed as replaceable rather than valued long-term assets.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All