Great benefits and pto. Long 13+ hour shifts 5 days a week - Warehouse Associate McKesson Employee Review

1.0
Nov 26, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Very generous health benefits, time off, and the new hire bonus. There are many opportunities for advancement if you are able to stay long enough (at least 1 year) to change positions.

Cons

I worked there from January to May 2023. Mandatory overtime is required everyday. It is mandatory that every employee stay until all the work is completed. During my time there, I frequently worked 12 to 13 hour shifts, 5 days a week. Many other employees would stay even longer or work 6 days a week. Employees are not informed how much work remains until about 15 minutes prior to being allowed to leave, if that. If another department needs help after you have finished your work, you may be required to stay to help them finish. The pay did not match the workload. The work environment is extremely stressful and fast paced. Employees are expected to be continuously moving throughout the entirety of their shift. Your time is monitored down to the second. I would not recommend this job long-term.

avatar
McKesson Response
2y
Thank you so much for taking the time to give feedback about your experience. Your feedback is invaluable to us as we strive to ensure a positive workplace environment for all our employees.

Explore other reviews about McKesson

5.0
Jun 26, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Flexible schedule Good leadership Supportive team

Cons

Hard to move up Customers can be difficult

1.0
Jun 3, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

1. relatively aloof culture for ICs to grow on their own 2. on and off few people are good 3. Actually consultants in india are better than some full time hires to work with. The h1bs in full time roles and some GCs/Americans are just 1 step away from unemployment line but there are some good quality consultants who can be directed well to bring in good work. Problem is lack of direction when middle management is just running after money.

Cons

1. top most management is clueless to what is going post the middle tier 2. middle tiers - VPs/SVPs/Directors and Sr. Directors are among the worst. Mostly cast offs from Consulting firms/Tech cos/Other Healthcare firms, this group has some of the worst, clueless folks who just think very narrowly about how to get rid of problems, maybe craft a story for higher ups. Get rid of this layer ( so called people management ) and co. could shine better on the work of ICs, decent software engineers and regular rank and file. 3. Main money maker distribution is different from tech group and the IT here is almost comical - 2 years ago in 2024 there were "directors" bringing AI agents with 90% hallucination .. I mean that has got to be an industry first!

1
avatar
McKesson Response
3w
Thank you for bringing these issues to our attention. We are committed to creating a positive work environment and are disappointed to learn that we fell short. We are taking your feedback seriously and are making efforts to address the concerns raised. Please feel free to reach out for a more in-depth discussion.
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All