Toxic / Unprofessional / Degrading - Security Analyst McKesson Employee Review

1.0
Apr 19, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Pay exceptionally well for industry, if all you want is a paycheck and can deal with disrespect, BS this is the place for you.

Cons

- Place is the definition of Toxic Work environment, for past 6 months to a year lost approximately 8-10 people. This is not a call center with hundreds of people these are highly skilled people who had been working in the industry for some time. Team originally had max of 20-25 people. - High Turn over... shows when recruiters post “ looking to hire several security analyst positions”. - Management doesn’t share the same vision, argue during meetings with staff as well as vendors. - Leadership will feed you the right lines early on to get you to buy into the vision. - Team has no direction of where they are going. - Always pass of blame to someone else. - Complete disregard from leadership. - Claim to support diversity, actions show otherwise not allowing certain people to conduct the technical work they desire instead treating them like a secretary (scheduling meetings) - Management trash talk all those that left, literally calling them a cry baby on recorded medium. - Management believes they can and will steam roll other teams to abide by their requests ultimately burning potential relationships with other teams.

Explore other reviews about McKesson

5.0
Feb 9, 2026
Anonymous intern
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great management and team, would work full time

Cons

Felt like a small cog in the company.

avatar
McKesson Response
4mo
Thank you for your valuable feedback. We’re so happy to hear your experience with McKesson has been a pleasant one.
1.0
Jun 3, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

1. relatively aloof culture for ICs to grow on their own 2. on and off few people are good 3. Actually consultants in india are better than some full time hires to work with. The h1bs in full time roles and some GCs/Americans are just 1 step away from unemployment line but there are some good quality consultants who can be directed well to bring in good work. Problem is lack of direction when middle management is just running after money.

Cons

1. top most management is clueless to what is going post the middle tier 2. middle tiers - VPs/SVPs/Directors and Sr. Directors are among the worst. Mostly cast offs from Consulting firms/Tech cos/Other Healthcare firms, this group has some of the worst, clueless folks who just think very narrowly about how to get rid of problems, maybe craft a story for higher ups. Get rid of this layer ( so called people management ) and co. could shine better on the work of ICs, decent software engineers and regular rank and file. 3. Main money maker distribution is different from tech group and the IT here is almost comical - 2 years ago in 2024 there were "directors" bringing AI agents with 90% hallucination .. I mean that has got to be an industry first!

1
avatar
McKesson Response
1w
Thank you for bringing these issues to our attention. We are committed to creating a positive work environment and are disappointed to learn that we fell short. We are taking your feedback seriously and are making efforts to address the concerns raised. Please feel free to reach out for a more in-depth discussion.
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All