Great Opportunities--you get out what you put in - Analyst McKesson Employee Review

4.0
Mar 14, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Overall, McKesson is a great company to work for if you're willing to work hard (and roll with the punches/be adapatable). As such a large company, there are virtually endless opportunities to expand your skillset (through both new roles and free training), but you have to put forth the effort to find/complete them. Their benefits, PTO, work from home, and work/life balance are generally great. There are lots of good people at the company, and lots of opportunities to network, collaborate, and try different kinds of roles. McKesson generally rewards employees who work hard, which is why so many people stay with the company for long periods of time/the life of their career. With any large company there will always be politics, but generally speaking, people who work hard (and network) do not have trouble getting promotions.

Cons

There is definitely a divide between those who hustle and those who 'coast'. The people who take advantage of learning/development opportunities are generally the hard workers/people who will move up at the company--however, there are still a large number of people (usually who have been with the company for 15+ years) who are content to do the bare minimum to keep their jobs. Those people exist both at the lower levels as well as in management--not all managers are willing to help their employees develop if it requires more effort than just a monthly check in. If you're under a bad manager, you can feel undervalued/overworked, while other people on the team seemingly do nothing all day and are compensated better because they have been with the company for a long time. In these situations, the only way out is to change roles/teams (which thankfully, McKesson has lots of opportunity to do). This leads to a 'brain drain' effect in the same departments over and over again, where long-time employees who consistently do not meet metrics stay with the department for years, while the 'new recruits' come in, work extremely hard, become disenchanted because they are overworked/underpaid, and leave the team as soon as they hit the 1 year mark and have the ability to apply out within the company. As the pharmaceutical industry grows and changes, McKesson has felt the pinch to cut costs as much as anyone. In some instances, that has led to senior management making sweeping changes to cut costs (while they adamantly deny it is cost-related) without thinking through the feasibility/impact on employees' day to day ability to do their work (for example, moving to flexible/non-assigned workspaces for the entire campus, regardless of whether or not some teams never work from home and need a desk every day to do their jobs).

Explore other reviews about McKesson

5.0
Feb 9, 2026
Anonymous intern
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great management and team, would work full time

Cons

Felt like a small cog in the company.

avatar
McKesson Response
4mo
Thank you for your valuable feedback. We’re so happy to hear your experience with McKesson has been a pleasant one.
1.0
Jun 3, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

1. relatively aloof culture for ICs to grow on their own 2. on and off few people are good 3. Actually consultants in india are better than some full time hires to work with. The h1bs in full time roles and some GCs/Americans are just 1 step away from unemployment line but there are some good quality consultants who can be directed well to bring in good work. Problem is lack of direction when middle management is just running after money.

Cons

1. top most management is clueless to what is going post the middle tier 2. middle tiers - VPs/SVPs/Directors and Sr. Directors are among the worst. Mostly cast offs from Consulting firms/Tech cos/Other Healthcare firms, this group has some of the worst, clueless folks who just think very narrowly about how to get rid of problems, maybe craft a story for higher ups. Get rid of this layer ( so called people management ) and co. could shine better on the work of ICs, decent software engineers and regular rank and file. 3. Main money maker distribution is different from tech group and the IT here is almost comical - 2 years ago in 2024 there were "directors" bringing AI agents with 90% hallucination .. I mean that has got to be an industry first!

1
avatar
McKesson Response
1w
Thank you for bringing these issues to our attention. We are committed to creating a positive work environment and are disappointed to learn that we fell short. We are taking your feedback seriously and are making efforts to address the concerns raised. Please feel free to reach out for a more in-depth discussion.
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All