employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Lockheed Martin

Is this your company?

Salaries for Engineers - Director of Engineering Lockheed Martin Employee Review

4.0
Aug 18, 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Lockheed is a good company; it used to be a great company to work for, but times have changed. I found the work to be interesting, management enlightened, and it was a company that cared for its employees as well as its shareholders. When I started there as a young engineer in 1967, as long as you worked your butt off , were smart, learned fast and used good judgment, you had a career for life. I think it is different now

Cons

I worked for Lockheed for 32 years, retiring as a Director at age 55 after serving as a Director of Engineering and then Director of Programs for space programs in Sunnyvale for over 15 years. The salaries they (and other Aerospace companies as well) are giving to both young engineers and experienced engineers are very low, compared to other non-engineering professions. When I left Lockheed 20 years ago, a senior staff engineer made $110K, from the data presented here, it looks like the salary is around $120K!! 9% salary increase in 20 years or 0.5%/year? I own a national manufacturing company and pay my supervisors with little or no college who are in their early 30's more than young aerospace system engineers. This is not right. It is not only a Lockheed Martin issue; it this way throughout the aerospace industry (and other industries who employ engineers).

Explore other reviews about Lockheed Martin

5.0
Aug 2, 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

High level of integrity throughout the company, open communications, and sincere interest in doing the right thing.

Cons

Unfortunately, I need to come up with twenty words of cons. When in reality after 41+ years in IT, I have no cons for Lockheed Martin. They are not perfect, but highly acceptable.

366
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All