I survived at Intel for 8 years. But left the company Oct. 2010 - Anonymous employee Intel Corporation Employee Review

4.0
Jan 29, 2011
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Intel is considered to be CSR (corporate social responsibility) oriented company. Seemingly it takes a good care of it's employees in terms of perks and professional development. There are however a lot of complaints being heard about the quality of middle management... incompetent managers, etc.

Cons

Intel's Focal process is riddled with flaws. Case in point: the requirement to collect 360 feedback from your peers (~7+). Providing feedback on your manager a different matter as there is often no other method to obtain honest opinion on management's performance. But there is an obvious conflict of interest when the very same people who are in your ranking group are asked to provide 360 feedback. It is often very easy to put 2&2 together and pinpoint the source of negative comments. For instance, I remember going way beyond the call of duty helping someone who made some unfair comments.

Explore other reviews about Intel Corporation

3.0
Jun 11, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Working as a Sales Associate at Intel provided valuable exposure to one of the world's leading technology companies. The role offered opportunities to develop customer-facing communication skills while building knowledge of cutting-edge products and innovations. Intel's strong brand reputation made it easier to engage customers and generate interest in solutions. The company emphasized professionalism, teamwork, and ongoing learning, creating a supportive environment for career development. Management generally provided clear expectations and performance metrics, which helped employees understand success criteria. The experience also strengthened problem-solving abilities, product presentation skills, and the ability to explain technical concepts to diverse audiences.

Cons

The role could be highly metrics-driven, creating pressure to consistently meet sales targets and performance expectations. Some periods involved repetitive tasks and customer interactions, which could become routine over time. As a large organization, decision-making processes sometimes felt slow, and implementing changes could take longer than expected. Product training was helpful but keeping up with frequent technology updates required continuous self-learning outside of normal responsibilities. Career advancement opportunities could be competitive depending on location and team structure. Additionally, balancing customer needs with sales goals occasionally created challenges, particularly during busy periods or when dealing with complex customer concerns.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All