Great place to learn, good work environment - Anonymous employee Infosys Employee Review

4.0
Mar 28, 2018
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

-You can be part of internal projects which can be challenging -Depending on your department / project / manager you can take more responsibilities (although you will not be promoted in a long time.) -Great work environment -Stability -Inclusive company -Mexico Country Head

Cons

- The projects are mostly production support / maintenance - The salaries were not revised in years - Slow professional growth - Promotion hikes are 4% average

Explore other reviews about Infosys

5.0
Feb 20, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

good work environment provides opportunity to learn

Cons

I had a good work experience, had no cons

4.0
Jun 10, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Job stability – Infosys is known for long-term employment and steady projects. Strong brand value – Having Infosys on your resume adds credibility and global recognition. Good learning opportunities – Access to internal learning platforms, certifications, and training programs (especially for freshers). Global exposure – Opportunities to work with international clients and global delivery teams. Structured processes – Well-defined policies, documentation, and governance. Work-life balance (project dependent) – Many teams offer reasonable working hours. Employee benefits – Health insurance, paid leaves, and wellness initiatives. Safe and inclusive workplace – Strong focus on ethics, compliance, and diversity.

Cons

Salary growth can be slow – Compensation increments may be lower compared to market standards. Limited flexibility in role changes – Internal mobility and project switches can take time. Bureaucratic processes – Decision-making can be slow due to multiple approval layers. Project allocation delays – Bench time and delayed onboarding to projects can happen. Variable learning exposure – Skill growth depends heavily on the project assigned. Less innovation in some teams – Certain projects may use legacy technologies. Onsite opportunities are limited – Compared to earlier years, onsite roles are fewer. Performance appraisal transparency – Rating systems may feel rigid or unclear.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All