Liars and unethical - Category Lead Infosys Employee Review

1.0
Sep 20, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Clients are great and you get to meet incredible people from around the world. In the right role, lots of international travel opportunities.

Cons

Liars and abuse visas. Continually try to replace US citizens and bring in Indians at 60% less wages. Abuse visas. Tells clients that employees have special skills when they dont. I was there 12 yrs and keep being put at clients to fix problems caused by on shore Indians. This is not against the Indian workers who did the best they could and worked hard. They just didn't have the skills. Now I work for a company and when outsourcing is discussed or bringing in contractors for a specific project, Infosys is not considered. Management are liars. Abuse low level staff. If you are American, you will not be promoted and they look for reasons to terminate you after you unknowingly train your indian replacement who comes to the US at a much lower salary.

Explore other reviews about Infosys

5.0
Feb 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Management Resources Work life Balance

Cons

Pay and benefits could be better

4.0
Jun 10, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Job stability – Infosys is known for long-term employment and steady projects. Strong brand value – Having Infosys on your resume adds credibility and global recognition. Good learning opportunities – Access to internal learning platforms, certifications, and training programs (especially for freshers). Global exposure – Opportunities to work with international clients and global delivery teams. Structured processes – Well-defined policies, documentation, and governance. Work-life balance (project dependent) – Many teams offer reasonable working hours. Employee benefits – Health insurance, paid leaves, and wellness initiatives. Safe and inclusive workplace – Strong focus on ethics, compliance, and diversity.

Cons

Salary growth can be slow – Compensation increments may be lower compared to market standards. Limited flexibility in role changes – Internal mobility and project switches can take time. Bureaucratic processes – Decision-making can be slow due to multiple approval layers. Project allocation delays – Bench time and delayed onboarding to projects can happen. Variable learning exposure – Skill growth depends heavily on the project assigned. Less innovation in some teams – Certain projects may use legacy technologies. Onsite opportunities are limited – Compared to earlier years, onsite roles are fewer. Performance appraisal transparency – Rating systems may feel rigid or unclear.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All