Expedia Inc Bellevue WA - Application Engineer Expedia Group Employee Review

4.0
Feb 7, 2013
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I've worked here a year and can say that I enjoy the people very much. And the management has it right as far as setting an example, listening to the engineering teams and being willing to try new things. The environment is very fast paced and learning who to talk about this takes some time.

Cons

As an engineer I have to touch a lot of servers, load balancers, documentation etc. Plus I have tools like splunk, remedy and etc that I need to use. It literally took months to get access. It should almost be automatic based on the group you are in. And making requests to other groups can be very tiresome. Remedy basically sucks and everyone has gone around it in some way or other except to write the final change request.

Explore other reviews about Expedia Group

5.0
May 4, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- good benefits - depending on team great culture

Cons

Not every team is the same

2.0
Mar 29, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Constant state of transformation is ripe environment for new hires and functional experts from big name tech companies

Cons

Pre-covid the culture was really special. Collaborative, engaging, people-centric, with a unifying mission to enable travel for the world. Since covid there has been a revolving door of executive leadership, and with each round, they throw out the current strategy to try something "new" without building from the current or past successes. Constant change, but no clear vision or strategy of what they are trying to change to. Lack of strategy and low risk tolerance leads to too many priorities with not enough investment to move the needle in anything. Quarterly layoffs, but executed quietly team by team so as not to make news. No psychological safety. Talent strategy since covid is to hire externally over internal promotions to gain "functional expertise" therefore difficult to grow your career. Siloed divisions not working towards common goal. Lacks operating model maturity needed for a company of this size likely do to revolving door of execs and priorities. A cash cow company with an identity crisis trying to be an AI innovator. Build vs buy mentality slows them down. Too many exec pet projects that aren't vetted with proper business cases.

4
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All