Great culture, smart people, does not provide the perks of other tech companies - Senior Director, Technology Expedia Group Employee Review

4.0
Feb 28, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great culture. Employees are passionate about travel and like to create great travel experiences for the customers. Good work-life balance. This is the first place I've worked where the executives and senior leaders genuinely advocate for using all of your vacation time to travel and see things. People are smart and capable.

Cons

The company is caught between being an online travel agent and a technology company. They do not yet provide the perks of a lot of more innovative tech companies - the compensation isn't as good, stock/equity is not part of the compensation structure, the benefits are not great, the engineering environment is not as open, innovation is slow and isn't encouraged as much, self-exploration isn't encouraged as much, etc. It's also a fairly political environment where people pay too much attention to their political posture. The company can improve customer service. Not just in the call centers, but how they think about making things simpler and better for customers, and driving their partners (the hotels, airlines, car rental companies, etc) to be better, which provide notoriously poor customer experience.

Explore other reviews about Expedia Group

5.0
Jun 24, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

work life balance lots of pto

Cons

limited room for growth in the company

2.0
Jun 25, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good pay, supportive manager, and genuinely pleasant colleagues.

Cons

Frequent reorgs and shifting strategic direction made it difficult to build momentum or plan long‑term. Over time, contractor roles became increasingly narrow and production‑focused, which limited opportunities for meaningful skill development. Responsibilities that originally included project management were reduced to primarily email production work. There’s also a broader corporate pattern where work is expected to be completed exactly as written, with little room for judgment or improvement. Even small, quick optimizations can lead to pushback rather than appreciation, creating an environment where going “above and beyond” requires multiple layers of approval — which defeats the purpose of being proactive in the first place. Finally, there’s an in‑office expectation (less strict than for full‑time employees, but still present) for work that can be done entirely remotely. This tends to benefit highly social personalities, but for those who prefer focused, independent work, it feels unnecessary. Social dynamics also play a noticeable role; if you’re not immediately well‑liked or you make a single early mistake, it can create a self‑fulfilling perception that’s difficult to overcome.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All