Major change and budget cuts ahead - Systems Analyst Conagra Brands Employee Review

2.0
Jul 21, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Flexible work-life balance, company promotes from within, development programs

Cons

Sean Connolly just announced the sale of our private brands business and we are losing a lot of good CAG employees with the sale. Sean is also in the process of making huge changes to ConAgra Foods in order to better compete with the 3G Capital-owned Heinz and Kraft. He has said we are adopting the 3G Capital model of reducing SG&A costs. We are now adopting a zero-based budgeting strategy that will force us to cut all costs but those which are very necessary for our business. Rumors of impending mass layoffs are spreading and this week several of our executive vice presidents were either terminated or voluntarily left the company. Sean keeps talking about outsourcing and reducing management to cut costs as well. Morale within the organization has definitely been hit hard. I'm starting to look at other opportunities because the outlook at ConAgra seems poor.

Explore other reviews about Conagra Brands

5.0
Apr 11, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The people are very nice, knowledgeable, and easy to work with! Benefits seemed generous and there are a lot of employee networks/resource groups There are opportunities to learn and take on different projects Good work/life balance There are a lot of middle managers who invest in you and advocate for you

Cons

This is likely the case for many other large companies but it sometimes took a lot of time to approve something (like a new job role or salary correction) because it goes through so many people. Sometimes it was also hard to be noticed and recognized by upper management. Although the “growth opportunities” are appreciated and nice for development, it doesn’t come with any additional pay.

1
2.0
Jun 11, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

* Great people to work with. Many employees are collaborative, supportive, and genuinely invested in helping one another succeed. * Strong heritage brand with a long-standing reputation in the industry. * Opportunity to gain exposure to a wide variety of work, projects, and business challenges. * Employees can develop broad experience across multiple areas of the business due to the scope and complexity of the organization. * Talented teams with significant institutional knowledge and expertise.

Cons

* Over the last six months, there has been a noticeable shift in culture and leadership approach. * While there is considerable emphasis on teaching, coaching, and upskilling, much of the development appears focused on reinforcing predetermined viewpoints rather than fostering meaningful learning, critical thinking, or diverse perspectives. * Decision-making increasingly appears to be driven by top-down directives, with limited emphasis on data-driven discussion or healthy debate. * Career growth and advancement opportunities are unclear, with few visible pathways for progression despite increasing expectations and responsibilities. * Workloads often feel unrealistic relative to available resources, staffing levels, and timelines, creating challenges for teams trying to maintain quality and balance competing priorities. * Employee retention does not appear to be a strategic priority. The departure of experienced employees has resulted in a loss of institutional knowledge, raising concerns about long-term organizational stability and engagement. * The current culture can feel more focused on alignment with leadership narratives than on employee development, collaboration, and evidence-based decision-making.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All