Only if you know how to play the game - Anonymous employee Adecco Employee Review

2.0
May 29, 2024
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great package with commission structure compared to other agencies Great flexibility Easy commute

Cons

High turnover rate, understaffed, and a bad induction process for new joiners. Team leader can be very biased and tend to borderline bullying team members. One of the Team Manager, an expat, pressured a new joiner into quitting, and limits the role a senior consultant can work on because he doesn't favor the person. Rates ladies based on their looks and not on qualification. No help from management, many quit because of the volatile structure and changing reporting line. Can be a daunting place for newcomers

Explore other reviews about Adecco

5.0
May 4, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The team was great to work with

Cons

Could have used an additional recruiter for the time I was there to free up the store manager to meet with more clients

1.0
Mar 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Onboarding for new hires was smooth

Cons

My experience with Adecco Staffing Agency reflects a significant disconnect between the expectations set during onboarding and the reality of assignment execution. There appears to be a consistent misalignment between candidate skill sets and the roles they are placed into, which not only undermines performance but also creates unnecessary inefficiencies for both the employee and the client organization. Assignments are often presented without full transparency regarding scope, schedule, or operational requirements, resulting in frequent adjustments that disrupt workflow continuity and personal planning. Additionally, there is a notable deficiency in accurate and timely reporting. Communication regarding assignment details, schedule changes, and performance expectations lacks consistency and clarity. This creates ambiguity in accountability and limits the employee’s ability to effectively manage deliverables. From a process standpoint, this reflects weak coordination and insufficient control mechanisms within their staffing and reporting systems. Most concerning is the apparent lack of advocacy for the employee. A staffing agency should function as an intermediary that ensures alignment between employer needs and employee capabilities while also safeguarding fair treatment and clear communication. In this case, there is a perception that employee concerns—particularly those related to schedule changes, workload expectations, and workplace conditions—are not adequately addressed or escalated. This ultimately results in a work environment that feels transactional rather than supportive, with limited consideration for employee well-being or long-term success.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All