Not Bad, Not Great - Recruiter Adecco Employee Review

3.0
Apr 6, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Large welcoming teams, lower stress levels than most other recruitment firms. High pressure moments, but for the most part a decent work life balance. Management is fairly hands off.

Cons

- Too many roles per person to handle efficiently - Growth and development is never spoken about. I asked my manager what I'd need to do to get a promotion and they had to look it up on the company manual and went on to say this is outdated, so let me ask around. - Has you working on all roles no matter how terrible the margins are for commission. - VERY talks about commission, commission structure or how to be strategic about the how to allocate your time for the best earning positions. This is probably because the commission is the lowest I've ever seen at 3%.

Explore other reviews about Adecco

5.0
Jun 23, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Easy interview process, fair pay, good remote work

Cons

contract was short term, which was okay for me but might not be what everyone wants

1.0
Mar 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Onboarding for new hires was smooth

Cons

My experience with Adecco Staffing Agency reflects a significant disconnect between the expectations set during onboarding and the reality of assignment execution. There appears to be a consistent misalignment between candidate skill sets and the roles they are placed into, which not only undermines performance but also creates unnecessary inefficiencies for both the employee and the client organization. Assignments are often presented without full transparency regarding scope, schedule, or operational requirements, resulting in frequent adjustments that disrupt workflow continuity and personal planning. Additionally, there is a notable deficiency in accurate and timely reporting. Communication regarding assignment details, schedule changes, and performance expectations lacks consistency and clarity. This creates ambiguity in accountability and limits the employee’s ability to effectively manage deliverables. From a process standpoint, this reflects weak coordination and insufficient control mechanisms within their staffing and reporting systems. Most concerning is the apparent lack of advocacy for the employee. A staffing agency should function as an intermediary that ensures alignment between employer needs and employee capabilities while also safeguarding fair treatment and clear communication. In this case, there is a perception that employee concerns—particularly those related to schedule changes, workload expectations, and workplace conditions—are not adequately addressed or escalated. This ultimately results in a work environment that feels transactional rather than supportive, with limited consideration for employee well-being or long-term success.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All