Very Shady Management and Corprate office need to be investigated in accounting and discrimination - Engineer Adecco Employee Review

1.0
Sep 14, 2012
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Highest Pay rate out of all the Saffing Companies

Cons

• They use a psychologist to interview you • They do not stand behind their employees • They recently lied to the state of Oregon and was caught • You are a contract and can be terminated at any time • Save any and all document including emails that are sent make sure you forward everything to your personal email • This is staffing company who places nonqualified people in positions that do not fit to meet their sales quota • They are recruiters and have quota to fill

Explore other reviews about Adecco

5.0
May 4, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The team was great to work with

Cons

Could have used an additional recruiter for the time I was there to free up the store manager to meet with more clients

1.0
Mar 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Onboarding for new hires was smooth

Cons

My experience with Adecco Staffing Agency reflects a significant disconnect between the expectations set during onboarding and the reality of assignment execution. There appears to be a consistent misalignment between candidate skill sets and the roles they are placed into, which not only undermines performance but also creates unnecessary inefficiencies for both the employee and the client organization. Assignments are often presented without full transparency regarding scope, schedule, or operational requirements, resulting in frequent adjustments that disrupt workflow continuity and personal planning. Additionally, there is a notable deficiency in accurate and timely reporting. Communication regarding assignment details, schedule changes, and performance expectations lacks consistency and clarity. This creates ambiguity in accountability and limits the employee’s ability to effectively manage deliverables. From a process standpoint, this reflects weak coordination and insufficient control mechanisms within their staffing and reporting systems. Most concerning is the apparent lack of advocacy for the employee. A staffing agency should function as an intermediary that ensures alignment between employer needs and employee capabilities while also safeguarding fair treatment and clear communication. In this case, there is a perception that employee concerns—particularly those related to schedule changes, workload expectations, and workplace conditions—are not adequately addressed or escalated. This ultimately results in a work environment that feels transactional rather than supportive, with limited consideration for employee well-being or long-term success.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All