I was recommended to the position from a head hunter. The requirements for the position fit my skill set perfectly and I have performed the same functionality from the provider side for 15+ years. I was given a range of dates and times to select and was told it was a multi-step interview. I arrived a few minutes early. One person arrived a few minutes late and told me to wait as they needed at least two people. This was a Teams Video call and since I had trouble with my personal laptop's camera, I went out of the way to configure my cell so video would be available. Neither of the interviewers enabled their camera. I was told this step would be a technical screen and was asked several questions in the areas of VB6, C#, SQL, and EDI. All of the questions were simple and I gave all simple answers given their positions and my background thrn only elaborated when prompted. For one question, it was not clear exactly what was being requested, for which I answered I do not know. This was the only one for which I received any feedback by being given the answer they wanted. This interview was for a remote position. One interviewer asked where I was from. I told I am just outside of Birmingham, Al and suggested it was probably clear from my accent I am in the south. They chuckled and went on to say they could hear it. One went on to say he wanted to know the time zone is the reason he asked. I also went ahead and gave that information also. Overall, I felt pretty good about it as I answered all their questions quickly and concisely. I also received no verbal feedback or followup on each question though I did inquire more than once if I gave sufficient detail in my answer. I could not take visual queues if they had given any. I was called by the head hunter the next day and was told their feedback stated I was not technical enough in each area. I found this odd since I am considered more technical than most by a community of technical people.