Papercheck Reviews

4.2

77% would recommend to a friend

(40 total reviews)

Darren Shafae

87% approve of CEO

84% positive business outlook

Papercheck has an employee rating of 4.2 out of 5 stars, based on 40 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an excellent working experience there. The Papercheck employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Management and consulting industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

40 reviews
5.0
Feb 3, 2022

I love my job.

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I greatly enjoy working here. The performance requirements are reasonable, and the work we get is often interesting. As with editing anywhere, some of the jobs are more challenging than others. Depending on how fast you work, there is the opportunity to earn commission. With the wide variety of work we get and with our performance requirements in mind, my editing knowledge and speed have significantly increased since I started working here. Employees here gain considerable experience in many different writing styles and at various levels of writing quality. There are abundant editing resources (e.g., style guides, templates, training information, documents explaining work-related processes), and if you can't find the answer to something, the senior editors are happy to help. The 401(k) match is great, and there's PTO. There are overtime opportunities depending on business. I highly appreciate my coworkers and the owner, who all are friendly and helpful. Everyone here seems to enjoy our work.

Cons

As some other reviewers have mentioned, there are limited feedback opportunities, which is something I think could be improved. There are slow times when someone on the shift must volunteer to take the shift off; however, as mentioned, there are also times when overtime is offered.

2.0
May 14, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The clients; while many were challenging, to put it mildly, there were some truly outstanding clients who truly sought to improve their writing through repeated business, often conducting interesting work or research, and sincerely appreciated editors' efforts and willingness to offer suggestions for improvement. The staff; truly, the team of editors is comprised of some remarkably brilliant and accomplished individuals from myriad professional and academic backgrounds. That they all ended up at Papercheck was and remains a mystery to me.

Cons

Missing the opportunity to continue engaging with some of my favorite clients is, without exaggeration, my sole regret upon leaving this company. To say that our management was unresponsive would be a tremendous understatement. Simple requests (and new ideas to improve both customer service and back-end workflow) went unanswered for months and, at times, seemed entirely discouraged. The working environment, particularly during the busy seasons (midterms and final exam periods, especially) was socially and mentally crippling -- the workload was simply inconsistent with the staffing structure day to day in the office. Combine these issues with perennial construction in the building (which makes it hard to concentrate on detailed editing), along with a company culture that demands silence in a room full of people, and you have a working hellscape.

1.0
May 14, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Employees who are desperate during this economy and have never worked elsewhere may find this company bearable.

Cons

I have been an editor for over 20 years. In my opinion, Papercheck had the most dishonest, disorganized, and disrespectful work environment I have ever encountered. When I applied and took an editing test, I was told that Editorlive.com was a third-party company to handle applicant testing. When doing research to prepare for my interview, I wondered whether or not Papercheck.com, Proof-reading.com, and Editorlive.com were all owned and operated by the same person, and whether or not Papercheck.com and Proof-reading.com use the same editors. I wish I had known the answer prior to being hired. The following are conditions I and coworkers witnessed as of March 2014: -24-hour editing service, but not enough seating, inadequate bathroom access, inadequate heating, and poor lighting—causing eye strain, headaches, and increasing the potential for editing errors to client papers. -High-crime neighborhood: sirens, gunshots, smell of marijuana, and people sleeping (or screaming) on the sidewalks outside were very distracting. -Editing services were provided day and night, year round. For employees, this often meant working holidays, which was not disclosed during the interview process. I have spoken to 5 former coworkers who were all laid off, quit, or otherwise left within the past 3 months. (Note that the only positive review thus far does not address the issue of the three websites. If the web developer does not work on all three sites, that would be useful to know. Papercheck appears to be a wonderful employer for web developers in Boston, but the office and editors I describe are in SF.)

Viewing 1 - 3 of 40 Reviews

Glassdoor has 43 Papercheck reviews submitted anonymously by Papercheck employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Papercheck is right for you.