Great company, good leadership, with untapped potential - Anonymous employee Talend Employee Review

4.0
May 21, 2021
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good size (~1300 pp), and good leadership team that communicates clearly and effectively,

Cons

Product innovation - that includes pricing, packaging etc. needs to be driven harder and faster, and move into new niche areas to differentiate from the competitors.

avatar
Talend Response
4y
Thank you for the review. We have some hugely exciting projects coming up that will give everyone a chance to share their innovative ideas. We hope you will take the time to present your ideas as we further our vision of taking the work out of working with data! . Again, thank you and every idea helps us upscale and grow!

Explore other reviews about Talend

5.0
May 28, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great culture, colleagues, and products

Cons

Acquisition by Qlik caused major disruptions and drove all existing employees away.

1
4.0
Sep 29, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

* Talend has a great foundation for technical growth with a strong product centered on Talend Studio which generates Java code for data integration using visual drag-and-drop components * Strong Eclipse technology and community are built into Talend Studio * Talend Studio addresses both batch integration (Jobs) and application integration (Routes) * Very rich palette of Components for batch integration Jobs * Generated code for event driven Routes uses Apache Camel which is excellent

Cons

* Poor generated code quality * Generated code for batch Jobs lacks a mature underlying framework (e.g. there is no underlying Spring Batch or equivalent that the generated code uses) * Design palette for Routes is very limited and does not contain most Camel components * Components for Camel Routes are poorly documented * Generated code for both Jobs and Routes is monolithic and not easily extended * Limited re-use and modularity of user designs. There is some, but it is not as robust or manageable as it should be. * Does not make use of modern software frameworks such as Spring. * Very poor tools for authoring SQL

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All