A company that recognizes performance but can lack in fostering long-term success through management excellence. - Product Manager Stryker Employee Review

4.0
Dec 28, 2008
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

High paced and highly energized work place. Results oriented so you get what you put in. Exciting industry, get to work with products that can make a difference. People you work with are very similar in drive and passion mainly due to the profiling test you take, the Gallup, during the interview. An ideal place if you want to be recognized for your hard work and results. Working with health care professionals is also very exciting. Compensation is competitive and the annual profit sharing to your 401K is very nice as well. The corporation has a track record of having good financial, especially their balance book.

Cons

Stryker can be very cut throat because of its highly paced environment. If you don't perform, you are quickly identified. However, the opposite is true as well. So, if you are not the type who thrives on competition and recognition based on performance, this is not a place for you. Also, the Gallup test can be very restrictive during the hiring process. They have gotten better but in the past, they used one profile matrix to hire every position. Obviously the same profile matrix for a sales or marketing position will not apply properly for an engineer or a manufacturing technician. Many good people in my opinion weren't even considered for this reason. Lastly, the HR isn't the most supportive organization. Again, they rely too heavily on the boiler plate Gallup model and misses the opportunity for individual employee development. The high turnover rate is a good indication for this.

Explore other reviews about Stryker

5.0
Jun 13, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

An excellent cross-functional working environment

Cons

The 10-hour shift work can be tiring especially if you have family commitments

3.0
May 17, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The individual contributors you work with are fantastic people and the products we work on are really interesting and have significant impacts on patient care.

Cons

Sports Medicine has unfortunately changed from a dynamic and collaborative group to one being led by toxic leadership. Rather than working together and trusting team members, they now have an in group and out group. If you’re in the in group, you can say anything you want without being questioned and be automatically trusted even when your track record says otherwise. If you’re in the out group and your message doesn’t align with what the leadership wants to hear, then you are automatically wrong and not to be trusted.

4
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All