Live w/Threats of Layoffs at all times - Anonymous employee Personify Health Employee Review

1.0
Feb 20, 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

One notable thing is when they made the decision to let the Chief People Officer go in December, a move that significantly alleviated tension across the team, despite reluctance for some to openly acknowledge it. Her leadership had previously fostered a highly detrimental and toxic workplace culture, so her departure marks a positive shift. She drove off many talented people. Additionally, the flexibility of remote work is another key benefit, contributing to an improved employee experience

Cons

The People Department has faced considerable turnover, contributing to an unstable team dynamic. Recently, a promotion was made to oversee multiple areas, yet there are doubts among employees about whether the individual possesses the necessary qualifications for such a broad role, fueling uncertainty about leadership decisions. The workplace culture is marked by a troubling degree of backstabbing, with employees frequently gossiping and undermining one another behind closed doors. This, combined with constant shifts in direction and a lack of consistency, creates an environment where no one feels secure enough to focus solely on their responsibilities. The pervasive fear and mistrust render the atmosphere profoundly unhealthy, eroding both morale and overall well-being.

Explore other reviews about Personify Health

5.0
May 12, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

This is a company that truly cares about your wellbeing. Great benefits.

Cons

Annual salary increases are below average.

2.0
May 18, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

great place to build experience in different skills, roles. Lots of people leaving leads to many opportunities for promotion, new roles in different departments

Cons

Complete lack of accountability across both client-facing and operational teams. The entire organization operates in survival mode with no real client-centric culture, no investment in quality execution, and no motivation tied to growth, performance, or career development. The role of Client Success has devolved into constant firefighting and damage control, leaving little to no opportunity to proactively build relationships, drive strategic value, or identify expansion opportunities. Mistakes and operational failures are common in client success environments, but what is alarming here is how consistently underperformance is tolerated. Employees who repeatedly fail to execute basic responsibilities are neither corrected nor held accountable. Poor performers are protected instead of managed, creating massive liabilities for both clients and their teammates. Leadership is almost entirely focused on managing upward rather than leading teams effectively. There is little meaningful support, coaching, or strategic direction provided below the immediate-direct-report level. A recurring pattern is leadership ignoring issues until quarter-end, then suddenly sending department-wide emails publicly calling out account owners, tagging employees directly, and demanding rushed action plans within 24–48 hours to satisfy executive reporting needs. Most interactions from leadership revolve around extracting reporting, metrics, or status updates to feed upward rather than solving root operational problems. There is also a pattern of selectively presenting client health data to leadership in order to create the appearance of departmental success. Excluding NPS results from at-risk or terminating clients is not “contextual reporting”.... it is cherry-picking metrics to artificially inflate narratives. Operational silos are another major issue. I witnessed delivery team members repeatedly fail to perform fundamental responsibilities, directly causing major client accounts to become at risk due to inaction or poor execution. Because accountability is fragmented across departments, these individuals can then avoid ownership by hiding behind the fact that they are "not client-facing or not the named account owner." This results in no one taking responsibility for resolving issues, communicating transparently with clients, or implementing meaningful corrective action after failures occur. Also, the pay is terrible. So many CSMs leave to go to lateral roles, and get paid 20 - 40k more at other companies that have this figured out.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All