Good company but has work to do - IT Manager PACCAR Employee Review

4.0
Sep 18, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I’ve been with PACCAR for over eight years in IT working with the lowest level to highest level employees. PACCAR is an interesting company, like any other it has good and bad attributes. It is a very stable but can be fiscally and culturally conservative. There is a lot of opportunity to grow your career with the aging of the workforce and legacy technology. If you’re inclined you can champion new technologies and methodologies to help modernize the company. Or try a different career path with the diverse set of businesses that PACCAR is in. While you won’t get paid the same as many of the tech companies in the area you can climb the ladder faster and get a great deal of experience. You have to be the change you want to see in the company and you are responsible for growing your own career.

Cons

PACCAR has been around a long time (110 years!) and is slow to change. PACCAR has a bad reputation when it comes to culture and a lot of that is deserved (read the beardgate reviews on here). You will likely not get the same compensation that tech companies in the area give but you will have a great place to make an impact. I feel that the company is slowly adjusting its culture to the modern work force. If it doesn’t it will have a hard time attracting the next generation as the boomers retire.

Explore other reviews about PACCAR

5.0
Jun 19, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good learning environment for engineering

Cons

Projects can be slow at times

1.0
Apr 15, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Not much, if you want a place that's okay with mediocrity, then welcome.

Cons

They blindly follow industry trends not industry standards. We have an initiative to use AI to increase productivity, without a proper plan, without security in mind and lack of general understanding. Consistently understaffed, for example there are teams or parts if teams that have max 4 developer type roles with 36 apps or APIs to support - this has lead to inconsistent code and effort as employees are spread too thin to be able to deliver quality work. Management refuses to take responsibility for issues that arise from being understaffed. Teams are not consistent in what tools and pipelines are used causing even more confusion and delays. Double standards: they don't want to properly promote or give raises to hard workers. Upper management made it clear to direct managers that "meets expectations" was a fine thing to give... To employees doing more than their fair share of work and are doing work outside of their role since they have no one else to do it do to being understaffed.

3
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All