employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Miller Environmental Group

Is this your company?

Horrible place to work - CDL Driver Miller Environmental Group Employee Review

1.0
Jan 19, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good pay for drivers and good benifits.

Cons

Give up on the thought of ever seeing your family. Theyy will ask you to shutoff your logbooks and go way beyond 70 hours. Also you aren’t just a driver you will have to clean tanks and be a general laborer. But they don’t tell you this.

avatar
Miller Environmental Group Response
7y
Thank you for your feedback. Miller Environmental Group adheres to all regulations set forth by the Department of Transportation (DOT) regarding Commercial Driving License (CDL) driving hours. Therefore any driver working a total of 70 hours in 8 consecutive days is provided the required 34 hour reset before getting behind the wheel of a CMV (any vehicle over 10,001). We are also compliant with the use of electronic log devices. We inform all of our CDL Driver candidates that the job may be labor intensive including the cleaning and decontamination of regulated materials from spills, trenches, drains, oil/water separators, boilers, tanks and other industrial cleaning applications. The successful applicant enjoys doing something different every day. One day a CDL Driver may drive all day to a disposal facility, the next they may be on-site remediating a spill resulting from a train derailment or an over-turned tractor trailer. Our employees often stand on the sidelines of history and help our environment while doing so! The company acknowledges that our employees go above and beyond to service the needs of our customers which can be day or night. The sacrifice can often mean working long hours which is rewarded in several ways including compensation. As a family-owned business, the company also takes strides to help employees when their families are in need and provides opportunities to be with family through paid time off, paid holidays and a paid trip for the employee and family to attend our annual holiday party.

Explore other reviews about Miller Environmental Group

5.0
Mar 7, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Some of the best people you will work with.

Cons

Management is only out for money.

1.0
Jan 22, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

This is a joke right?

Cons

Since its inception, the company has consistently demonstrated a failure to adhere to labor laws and ethical standards. The following areas outline the systemic issues encountered during my tenure: Wage and Benefit Discrepancies: There is a documented pattern of unauthorized payroll deductions labeled as "Miscellaneous" without prior disclosure. Furthermore, the company has failed to consistently remit employee 401(k) contributions and promised employer matches. Most critically, there are instances of gross underpayment for hours worked (e.g., 25 hours paid for 60 hours of labor), which constitutes a direct violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). Negligent Hiring and Operational Instability: The company engages in predatory hiring practices, including recruiting via referrals for positions that are terminated shortly thereafter, suggesting a lack of fiscal planning or transparency regarding job security. Health and Safety Violations: Management maintains a negligent approach to workplace safety. Despite mandatory drug testing policies, there is documented evidence of employees utilizing synthetic urine to bypass screens. Management has knowingly allowed the active abuse of prescription medication on-site, creating a hazardous work environment. Contractual and Travel Misrepresentation: Employees are frequently sent on out-of-state assignments under false pretenses regarding duration (e.g., 2-week assignments extending to 5 months) and are subjected to restricted freedom of movement. Discriminatory Termination and Lack of Due Process: My recent termination was the result of a verbal altercation initiated by a colleague. Despite acting in self-defense, I was terminated without an investigation or explanation. This suggests a biased disciplinary process based on gender rather than a factual review of the incident.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All