Best improver I've come across - Finance MiQ Employee Review

3.0
May 7, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Culture/energy - Stance on mental well-being - Stance on inclusion and diversity - Good non-montary benefits - Transparent C-suite (CEO etc..) - Engaging with all employees - Flexible working arrangement - Other start-up style perks such as offsites, free food, drinks, company trips etc...

Cons

- Core functions do not get the recognition or acknowledgement for important work as much as Sales/CS team - Flexible working also means some people have urgent requests at bizarre times - Even though there's a lot of awareness and talks about well-being and I&D, there aren't many tangible outcomes as a result of it (yet) - Less women in senior/management positions - Pay is slightly lower than industry standard at this point in time - Pay may be defined by qualifications and not experience - Systems are not perfect - Mixture of management styles

Explore other reviews about MiQ

5.0
Sep 9, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

People, pay, experiences are awesome

Cons

Lot of time commitment needed

1
2.0
Jun 19, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Solid Benefits - Only 2 Days in office per week (for now) - Generous PTO - Flexible hours due to regular collaboration with the COE teams in India

Cons

I had a mixed experience at MiQ, with some talented colleagues and solid learning opportunities, but overall it was frustrating. During my time there, much of my team turned over, creating constant disruption and uncertainty. One of the biggest challenges was the frequent shifting of priorities, with projects and initiatives often changing direction, making it difficult to feel that work was being executed consistently. There were also regular requests from leadership that felt misaligned with core responsibilities, contributing to a sense of wasted time and effort and overall inconsistency week to week. From an organizational perspective, decision-making seemed highly centralized, which sometimes slowed progress and limited autonomy for managers and teams. Exec Leadership frequently spoke about the company's positive culture and employee experience, but that messaging often felt disconnected from broader employee sentiment. Career growth and promotion processes were another concern, with an informal expectation that employees spend at least two years in role before being considered for promotion, and advancement often feeling tied as much to internal politics and visibility as to performance and impact. These types of promotion discussions were disappointing, with positive performance feedback not translating into clear or timely explanations regarding advancement decisions.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All