employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Mavis Tutorial Centre

Is this your company?

Steer clear. - Lead Teacher Mavis Tutorial Centre Employee Review

1.0
Jun 7, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

A few experienced and dependable ex-colleagues whom I can trust but most of them have since left this company.

Cons

The company's negative reviews are accurate because the higher-ups refuse to acknowledge their flaws and adhere to an outdated management style. Promises made to attract people to the company are rendered void once they join. The higher-ups openly practice favoritism, treating those in their favor with great praise and disregarding others. Certain centre managers exhibit hypocrisy by pretending to be supportive and empathetic but in reality, they act as informants. This company lacks progressiveness, causing many excellent teachers to leave due to the toxic environment. The benefits provided by the company are so minimal that they might as well not exist. There are no welfare initiatives or even corporate discounts on phone bills or reasonable medical consultation claim rates, which are capped at a mere S$20 despite inflation over the years.

Explore other reviews about Mavis Tutorial Centre

4.0
Mar 14, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Love it, couldn't be better

Cons

New hires are terribly screened

1.0
May 28, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

* Opportunity to gain teaching experience and work with students from different backgrounds. * Some colleagues and students were supportive and enjoyable to work with.

Cons

* Teachers on medical leave were at times expected to continue conducting lessons remotely instead of proper relief arrangements being made. * Student withdrawals were often reflected negatively on teachers even when the reasons were unrelated to teaching quality, such as relocation or scheduling conflicts. * There was insufficient onboarding and handover support provided to new staff at the start of employment. * Communication and management style varied significantly across centres, and some interactions with management felt dismissive or unprofessional. * Contributions outside the curriculum scope did not always feel acknowledged or valued. * Teacher performance appeared to be measured heavily based on class enrolment numbers rather than overall teaching quality and effort. * HR response times for clarifications and administrative matters could be improved.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All