employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Mavis Tutorial Centre

Is this your company?

Absolutely the worst tuition center. - Tutor Mavis Tutorial Centre Employee Review

1.0
Dec 21, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Some administrators and colleagues are nice.

Cons

By far, the most exploitive tuition center. 6 days work at 6 different locations. Own gadgets to bring. Usage of 7-9hrs per day. Spoil faster. No compensation. Must bring at least 2/3 gadgets with chargers, HDMI cable etc. Very heavy to bring around to different locations. Very heavy workload, too much travelling for small pay. Sometimes have to attend meeting on the only one off day. A new staff is always the scapegoat for endless relief duties and curriculum work. Very high number of MCs and high turnover due to the toxic work culture. Very high-handed and unscrupulous management. In the interview, the management sugarcoats and misleads you to sign up. Only after joining, you find out the true extent of work scope, schedule, duties, expectations, etc. Horrible experience. Might as well WFH with your own gadgets and be so much happier than sacrifice your expensive gadgets for the development and functioning of an unappreciative company. Totally not worth working here. You will be miserable.

Explore other reviews about Mavis Tutorial Centre

4.0
Mar 14, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Love it, couldn't be better

Cons

New hires are terribly screened

1.0
May 28, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

* Opportunity to gain teaching experience and work with students from different backgrounds. * Some colleagues and students were supportive and enjoyable to work with.

Cons

* Teachers on medical leave were at times expected to continue conducting lessons remotely instead of proper relief arrangements being made. * Student withdrawals were often reflected negatively on teachers even when the reasons were unrelated to teaching quality, such as relocation or scheduling conflicts. * There was insufficient onboarding and handover support provided to new staff at the start of employment. * Communication and management style varied significantly across centres, and some interactions with management felt dismissive or unprofessional. * Contributions outside the curriculum scope did not always feel acknowledged or valued. * Teacher performance appeared to be measured heavily based on class enrolment numbers rather than overall teaching quality and effort. * HR response times for clarifications and administrative matters could be improved.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All