Does not value individual employee loyalty/longevity - Project Architect Leidos Employee Review

1.0
Oct 19, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Team members on a project level were good to work with

Cons

After 15 years of working at Leidos, the closing of our location was announced with two weeks notice. Although official policy allows for severance packages, absolutely no severance pay or extended benefits have been offered. It is clear that at a corporate level, there is no value for the individual. I can understand the need for tightening up at a corporate level and closing some locations, but the clear disregard of professional norms and standards for ethical layoffs has left a bad taste in my mouth. I do not recommend this company as a place to build a career, maybe a short term stop to gain experience.

Explore other reviews about Leidos

5.0
May 15, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great culture, supportive management, encouragement for self development

Cons

Some decisions move too slowly.

3.0
May 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Leidos provides opportunities to work on complex government programs with meaningful technical challenges. Depending on the contract and team, there can be exposure to cloud infrastructure, cybersecurity, systems engineering, networking, and mission-focused work that is difficult to find elsewhere. The company also has a large footprint, so there may be internal opportunities for people who are able to navigate the organization.

Cons

My experience was that the quality of management varied significantly by program. Communication around expectations, roles, and priorities was often inconsistent, and decisions that affected employees were not always explained clearly or handled in a transparent way. Work-life balance also depended heavily on local management. Flexibility that existed in practice could be changed quickly, and employees were sometimes left trying to reconcile changing expectations with existing workloads and personal obligations. In my view, the company would benefit from stronger oversight of program-level management decisions, especially where employee responsibilities, workplace flexibility, and performance feedback are concerned. I also found that technical decision-making was sometimes driven more by schedule pressure than by sound engineering judgment. On complex government programs, that can create unnecessary risk and frustration for employees who are trying to do things correctly.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All