They don't care about employees' wellbeing or happiness - Programme Analyst Leidos Employee Review

2.0
Nov 9, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The small team I work with is very talented; not a lot of micromanagement, 100% remote, my direct manager is great and open to communication, sometimes the work is really interesting and I feel proud to be doing what I'm doing, I'm well-trusted

Cons

Work/ life balance is awful, we're losing people at a very fast pace because there's no incentive to stay, work is getting piled on the remaining team because Leidos cannot say "no" to more contacts (i.e., they care more about the money than keeping their employees happy), management and team leads have taken a terrible turn for the worst over the past year, there's an unbelievable unbalance of work divided between team members, I feel like I'm doing the work of three people while others are out at a salon during the day, all of the projects lately have super tight turn around and are gigantic meaning we've had to work holidays and overtime without getting compensated for it, overtime is typically not acceptable even though we're working late hours, the benefits are awful, there's not a lot of communication between management so no one ever really knows how many projects you're working on at a time, I've been here 7 years and have never once received a "real" raise only a 2% increase in pay yearly for merit, I'm supposed to be a programmer and e-learning developer however because of the shortage of people I'm pulled in every direction writing storyboards, cdgs, setting up meetings with clients, it's definitely not in my job description, no appreciation, had to use PTO during government shutdowns and during illness with covid

Explore other reviews about Leidos

5.0
May 7, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Large companies. Willingness to work with you.

Cons

Low paying. No hybrid opportunity

3.0
May 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Leidos provides opportunities to work on complex government programs with meaningful technical challenges. Depending on the contract and team, there can be exposure to cloud infrastructure, cybersecurity, systems engineering, networking, and mission-focused work that is difficult to find elsewhere. The company also has a large footprint, so there may be internal opportunities for people who are able to navigate the organization.

Cons

My experience was that the quality of management varied significantly by program. Communication around expectations, roles, and priorities was often inconsistent, and decisions that affected employees were not always explained clearly or handled in a transparent way. Work-life balance also depended heavily on local management. Flexibility that existed in practice could be changed quickly, and employees were sometimes left trying to reconcile changing expectations with existing workloads and personal obligations. In my view, the company would benefit from stronger oversight of program-level management decisions, especially where employee responsibilities, workplace flexibility, and performance feedback are concerned. I also found that technical decision-making was sometimes driven more by schedule pressure than by sound engineering judgment. On complex government programs, that can create unnecessary risk and frustration for employees who are trying to do things correctly.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All