Evolving company with opportunities to be successful - Anonymous employee Leidos Employee Review

4.0
Apr 2, 2015
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Opportunities to separate yourself from the "pack" if you're willing to do the work and establish yourself as a strong performer. Improving communication and transparency from company leaders. Working to identify areas of improvement and attempting to improve certain areas. Creating a company identity is a work in progress after company split but there's evidence of improvement. Ability to communicate and share feedback with company leadership, management, HR, etc. Decent work/life balance and flexible work schedule depending on the role being performed.

Cons

Sometimes the message from company leaders doesn't make it to the individual contributors. Endless amount of change to the company, culture, and benefits has resulted in low morale and a perceived lack of appreciation. Sense of entitlement among employees who are busy living in the past and not in reality (as it relates to company benefits, budgets, etc.). Few opportunities for training/development, educational opportunities, etc.

Explore other reviews about Leidos

5.0
May 7, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Large companies. Willingness to work with you.

Cons

Low paying. No hybrid opportunity

3.0
May 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Leidos provides opportunities to work on complex government programs with meaningful technical challenges. Depending on the contract and team, there can be exposure to cloud infrastructure, cybersecurity, systems engineering, networking, and mission-focused work that is difficult to find elsewhere. The company also has a large footprint, so there may be internal opportunities for people who are able to navigate the organization.

Cons

My experience was that the quality of management varied significantly by program. Communication around expectations, roles, and priorities was often inconsistent, and decisions that affected employees were not always explained clearly or handled in a transparent way. Work-life balance also depended heavily on local management. Flexibility that existed in practice could be changed quickly, and employees were sometimes left trying to reconcile changing expectations with existing workloads and personal obligations. In my view, the company would benefit from stronger oversight of program-level management decisions, especially where employee responsibilities, workplace flexibility, and performance feedback are concerned. I also found that technical decision-making was sometimes driven more by schedule pressure than by sound engineering judgment. On complex government programs, that can create unnecessary risk and frustration for employees who are trying to do things correctly.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All